The Evolution That is GRAN TURISMO

Originally posted by Bobs_Hardware
NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SOLID SNAKE!!!!!!  WHAT ARE YOU DOING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  IM THE BOUNCY MAN!!!!!  NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

*takes down notes* never give Solid Snake 88 a Bouncy *puts pen down*

I changed it to a....um, smokin. Now are u happy?
*runs and hides*

Good Work Racer... your achievements inspire the aussie nation!

About nearly every GT3 screen, (now i\'m not against this game...) but they are nearly all replays... i hardly ever see an in game play... it will still rock tho.. but a noooo touchy for me...

[Bobs_Hardware]

I changed it to a....um, smokin. Now are u happy?
*runs and hides*

haha, its kewl dude, i was just joke.....but dont do it again *looks evil*

WOW, great thread friend!! NICE!!

Wow ##RaCeR##...

this is some funky $hit !!! It was nice to see all the wonderfull Pics again !!! THX !!!!!

Yeah cool thread

Good post,i was just thinking about the first shots i saw of the game,shows how the game has come along way,and how we shouldnt judge a game from the first shots,we need to give it some time.

P.S what do you all think of the first post,do you think it looks more real?i carnt make my mind up,also did that demo have something to do with the first GT game?

I never knew that they actually played that thing!

pretty cool timeline


the only thing left to do is play the game

Whats up ddaryl, you been kinda grumpy lately

Originally posted by ##RaCeR##
Whats up ddaryl, you been kinda grumpy lately

naw I\'m not grumpy

but I\'m bored to death of GT3 pics and Movies.

The only thing I want to do is play this beast


I said its a good timeline, but the fact that we get 2 - 5 GT3 thread posted every week has made me numb to any new info or threads


I really just want to play the game now

Don\'t worry, if things are stale good old Lavan can continue to b!tch at length about the merits of an accurate damage model in racing games.

Originally posted by Lavan
Don\'t worry, if things are stale good old Lavan can continue to b!tch at length about the merits of an accurate damage model in racing games.

yeah but the *****ing has nothing to do with SOny or Polyphony. Its all the car manufacturers, so any simulator like Gran Turismo immediately suffers because of this.

There is nothing that can be done in this type of game, getting rid of all the car liscence takes alot of the sparkle away from GT more then the damage issues.

Okay, you keep making that statement, and I\'ll keep repeating my reply, play Jarret & Labonte Racing, or Colin McRae 2.0, both games have a huge selection of LICENCED cars - J&L has several models from Mitsubishi, Toyota, Nissan, Chrysler, BMW, Audi, Vauxhall and more. There are more than 50 different cars, and Codemasters didn\'t have nearly as much cash as Polyphony to get licences. All of those cars can be completely smashed up.

Now, I believe it was Sublimesjg who said that perhaps Polyphony didn\'t include a model because not ALL the car manufacturers wanted to include damage. If that was the case, I would gladly take LESS CARS (and still not significantly less because J&L had a lot of manufacturere) for BETTER GAMEPLAY that would come with the damage model.

Polyphony and Sony have made a decision that puts car selection over gameplay, and I for one am not going to stand around with pom-poms and cheer that GT3 will be the best thing since sliced bread when to me it seems it will be GT2 with better graphics and better handling.

Agressive AI doesn\'t mean jack-sh!t if there\'s no real life damage.

Originally posted by Lavan
Agressive AI doesn\'t mean jack-sh!t if there\'s no real life damage.

Well we can get GT3 in June, or we can wait another year for them to impliment car damage for all the cars.  I can\'t wait any longer.  And I dissagree about the "...AI doesn\'t mean jack..."  I am really excited for the more intelligent AI.  It will make the game even more realistic and even more fun to play than previous GT games.