Ninty & MS to own E3

LOL - love your new signature Fast.. hehe...

[BizioEE]

well...I think the console-war is not over...it\'s too early...we have still 4 years this gen...

Fagget you don\'t even know me! What a Jackass! Maybe you should tag up with miss cleo, I mean you really know someone you\'ve never met or even seen? I don\'t know you like you know me but I bet you are in your mid 30\'s and living in your parents basement. Just plz shut the **** up and go away.

Vivi, that\'s horrible...you\'ve gone way low.

And mm, why must you keep reminding everyone of what they already know?  

Anyone who visits this board will know a little basic knowledge of PS2 and what\'s going on with it, as they probably have one.  All your efforts do is piss people off and take the topic to the all infamous "my console is better than yours".  

You happen to see somebody gloat about a certain game on X system and you, chrono, or ooseven throw stupid **** like "Halo @ 30fps, the controller\'s too big, or that PS2 has 30 million plus sales". Then seven begins his rant about how PS2 is technically superior in his mind and must impose this on everyone else...it\'s all a worn out script...

ooseven, I must say you\'ve become the worst lately.  Does anyone even reply to your posts anymore?

The topic was about E3 and who had the most impressive showing...everyone is going to have different opinions, why can\'t we share them.  We don\'t always have to necessarily debate them...

Okay so here it is.  PS2 has 30 million plus sales...no ****!! Anything you would like to add?

yeah, i\'d like to add this

click me

Scratch that...I downloaded it...

Again, what does this matter to the topic at hand...was it merely Sony\'s way of a filler for a lackluster showing at E3?

yeah, we\'ll check the japanese sales charts next week to see what effect it had

i SO wish they published US sales data

You said it yourself, E3 has no effect on the public...

Besides, I think E3 sucked...not enough suprises.   I am curious as to how the price drops have effected all the consoles...I walked into Best Buy the other day and all the console shelves were empty!!

yeah, i went into best buy the other night to pick up GTA3 PC, and i noticed they had a huge xbox display up front toting the price cut

but i noticed alot of them sitting on the shelf also

You happen to see somebody gloat about a certain game on X system and you, chrono, or ooseven throw stupid **** like "Halo @ 30fps, the controller\'s too big, or that PS2 has 30 million plus sales". Then seven begins his rant about how PS2 is technically superior in his mind and must impose this on everyone else...it\'s all a worn out script...

Ginko, when did I start a thread about how PS2 is technically superiour? I reply when someone makes a mistake (for example bashing on PS2 or declaring other consoles as far superiour with false information) - and then it usually gets into a debate. Seems to me you can\'t deal with it, that PS2 is actually proving itself worthy, even against 2 year newer consoles. Quit your whinning and get over it.

[Living-In-Clip]

I\'m going to ignore the whole debate at hand and just answer the question posed in the title.

I think NIntendo owned E3, simply because of their first party games . In my opinion, MS didn\'t even have a show worth noting and as for Sony, they blew all their guns way before E3, so there wasn\'t a lot for them to show either.

Originally posted by seven


Ginko, when did I start a thread about how PS2 is technically superiour? I reply when someone makes a mistake (for example bashing on PS2 or declaring other consoles as far superiour with false information) - and then it usually gets into a debate. Seems to me you can\'t deal with it, that PS2 is actually proving itself worthy, even against 2 year newer consoles. Quit your whinning and get over it.

You go off on people who think that Xbox is more powerful, then you start throwing your numbers around.  I don\'t see how you can compare two consoles that you don\'t know about from developing experience...you base it on numbers while it should be based on performance.  

Deal with it?  There are only about two people in here who choose to debate with you about specs and it comes out the same each time...nowhere.

You go off on people who think that Xbox is more powerful, then you start throwing your numbers around. I don\'t see how you can compare two consoles that you don\'t know about from developing experience...you base it on numbers while it should be based on performance.

Yeah, they think it\'s more powerful because they choose to believe those ignorant claims and misleading numbers. And what do I do? I point it out to them where they are wrong.

Hey Ginko, it\'s okay for them to be ignorant right, but it\'s not right to clear them up - isn\'t it?

[BizioEE]

Originally posted by seven


Yeah, they think it\'s more powerful because they choose to believe those ignorant claims and misleading numbers. And what do I do? I point it out to them where they are wrong.

People think XBox is more powerful because the hardware say that,real specs say that,and unbiased devs say that...misleading numbers?  they\'re wrong? who?  you are the only one who show misleading numbers,flawed logic and bs crap...everyone knows that dear seven...

Hey Ginko, it\'s okay for them to be ignorant right, but it\'s not right to clear them up - isn\'t it?

you are the first to be ignorant...so...what\'s your point?

[Bobs_Hardware]

ohhh.. oh dear.. look what im about to do..

*pulls pants down*