Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Libby\'s indictment. Dems want Rove.  (Read 1314 times)

Offline GigaShadow
  • Information Minister
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5610
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Libby\'s indictment. Dems want Rove.
« Reply #15 on: November 02, 2005, 01:29:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SirMystiq
OK...

Clinton has been out of office for sometime now and you still bring him up constantly.

And about the rest of your post(which I did not read)...I didn\'t even notice.


Hey Dimwit - the 2004 election... you know the one with John F. Kerry vs. George W. Bush was exactly one year ago today. WTF are you bringing Clinton up for? Where did I mention the election of 2000?

You claim you can think? :lmao:
Logged
\"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.\"  - Churchill
[/i]
[/size]One Big Ass Mistake America

Global Warming ROCKS!!!![/b]

Offline SirMystiq

  • Singin the Doom song
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2275
  • Karma: +10/-0
  • PSN ID: SirMyztiq
Libby\'s indictment. Dems want Rove.
« Reply #16 on: November 02, 2005, 02:00:43 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GigaShadow
First of all Libby wasn\'t indicted for outing a CIA agent.  The best the prosecution could come up with is he lied to a grand jury regarding what he told reporters - not for outing a CIA agent.

Secondly, Clinton did the exact same thing and committed perjury before a grand jury.  After 2 years of investigating Fitzgerald has nothing.



YOU brought him up.

...I know what happened in 2004...I just did not take time to notice that today was the anniversary?
Logged
Don\'t try to confuse me with what you call  facts, my mind is already made up.
Offline GigaShadow
  • Information Minister
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5610
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Libby\'s indictment. Dems want Rove.
« Reply #17 on: November 02, 2005, 04:54:26 PM »
And you addressed it - already - your mind is stuck on one post earlier up in the thread.  Guess you can\'t defend that either eh?  Hypocrite.
Logged
\"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.\"  - Churchill
[/i]
[/size]One Big Ass Mistake America

Global Warming ROCKS!!!![/b]

Offline SirMystiq

  • Singin the Doom song
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2275
  • Karma: +10/-0
  • PSN ID: SirMyztiq
Libby\'s indictment. Dems want Rove.
« Reply #18 on: November 02, 2005, 05:40:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GigaShadow
And you addressed it - already - your mind is stuck on one post earlier up in the thread.  Guess you can\'t defend that either eh?  Hypocrite.



I addressed your argument that if Clinton didn\'t then we should just STFU and let the current government do it also.

...
Logged
Don\'t try to confuse me with what you call  facts, my mind is already made up.
Offline GigaShadow
  • Information Minister
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5610
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Libby\'s indictment. Dems want Rove.
« Reply #19 on: November 02, 2005, 05:58:08 PM »
No it is hypocritical to make this such a big issue when its not.  Clinton\'s purgury wasn\'t a big deal either, yet those like you who hate Bush are drooling over this as if it were some huge scandal.  :rolleyes:
Logged
\"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.\"  - Churchill
[/i]
[/size]One Big Ass Mistake America

Global Warming ROCKS!!!![/b]

Offline SirMystiq

  • Singin the Doom song
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2275
  • Karma: +10/-0
  • PSN ID: SirMyztiq
Libby\'s indictment. Dems want Rove.
« Reply #20 on: November 02, 2005, 06:00:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GigaShadow
No it is hypocritical to make this such a big issue when its not.  Clinton\'s purgury wasn\'t a big deal either, yet those like you who hate Bush are drooling over this as if it were some huge scandal.  :rolleyes:


Maybe because it is a huge scandal?

"As I understand it, the identity was leaked as a \'reprisal\' for political views, and that\'s a most unacceptable reason to do that."

Is that not very big? A top government official releasing secret information in order to taint the credibility of an opponent?
Logged
Don\'t try to confuse me with what you call  facts, my mind is already made up.
Offline GigaShadow
  • Information Minister
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5610
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Libby\'s indictment. Dems want Rove.
« Reply #21 on: November 02, 2005, 06:06:34 PM »
First of all it wasn\'t leaked and it was common knowledge around DC that Plames wife was in the CIA.  Where is the scandal?  The hype is all because of the rabid left\'s hatred for the administration.  If anyone outed Plame it was her husband.

Wilson claims that all this publicity has jeopardized his wifes safety, but has the audacity to pose with her for a Vanity Fair photo spread?   Give me a fucking break.
Logged
\"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.\"  - Churchill
[/i]
[/size]One Big Ass Mistake America

Global Warming ROCKS!!!![/b]
Offline hyper
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 461
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Libby\'s indictment. Dems want Rove.
« Reply #22 on: November 02, 2005, 09:23:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GigaShadow
First of all it wasn\'t leaked and it was common knowledge around DC that Plames wife was in the CIA.  Where is the scandal?  The hype is all because of the rabid left\'s hatred for the administration.  If anyone outed Plame it was her husband.

Wilson claims that all this publicity has jeopardized his wifes safety, but has the audacity to pose with her for a Vanity Fair photo spread?   Give me a fucking break.


I do not see how you can claim Wilson outed his wife. It may have been "common knowledge" that Plame was an ordinary CIA agent. However, her covert status did not become common knowledge until the publication of Novak\'s article. Although she was safely based in Virginia at the time, the article still blew her cover.

Libby\'s crime was perjury, making false statements, and obstruction of justice, the same exact charges that hyperventilating Republicans brought against Clinton. Before you start criticizing the rabidness of the left on this issue, consider for a moment the minority party that compared a president\'s sexual fling to Watergate.
Logged
Offline GigaShadow
  • Information Minister
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5610
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Libby\'s indictment. Dems want Rove.
« Reply #23 on: November 03, 2005, 05:26:43 AM »
Sitting behind a desk at Langley is not covert.  Any fool could park a car outside the gates and watch who goes in and out.

As I have said for the fiftieth time I don\'t think what Clinton did was worthy of impeachment.  Sorry to burst your bubble, but I am not being a hypocrite on this - merely explaining that I think neither were a big issue.
Logged
\"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.\"  - Churchill
[/i]
[/size]One Big Ass Mistake America

Global Warming ROCKS!!!![/b]
Offline hyper
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 461
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Libby\'s indictment. Dems want Rove.
« Reply #24 on: November 03, 2005, 03:08:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GigaShadow
Sitting behind a desk at Langley is not covert.  Any fool could park a car outside the gates and watch who goes in and out.


That is irrelevant. Her status was officially covert. Driving home the point:

"Mr Fitzgerald responded in a press conference on Friday that people who work undercover for their country need to know that they will not be unmasked lightly, and that when their cover is blown it is crucial that officials co-operate with any investigation. Failure to do so amounts to a breach of public trust."

Quote

As I have said for the fiftieth time I don\'t think what Clinton did was worthy of impeachment.  Sorry to burst your bubble, but I am not being a hypocrite on this - merely explaining that I think neither were a big issue.


Agreed. You were implying that only the Democrats could be "whiny, insignificant" and so unreasonably rabid. By admitting that the Lewinsky affair was not a big issue, you have conceded that Republicans can be just as bitchy. Point made.
Logged
Offline Ghettomath
  • Being Used
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 745
  • Karma: +10/-0
Libby\'s indictment. Dems want Rove.
« Reply #25 on: November 19, 2005, 08:20:06 AM »
In recent developments...

Journalist god Bob Woodward reveals Valarie Plame\'s name was also leaked to him by a "top administrative" official of the Bush administration, but not Libby.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-11-19-woodward-source_x.htm

They\'ve got Libby McFibby, but I have a feeling he only took the fall for a higher-up official.
Logged
SirMystiq for Pres.
Offline hyper
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 461
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Libby\'s indictment. Dems want Rove.
« Reply #26 on: November 21, 2005, 08:03:48 PM »
That avatar receives my vote for the most revolting avatar ever. *blrrghh*
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk