Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: GOP opposition to clean energy bill  (Read 2054 times)

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
GOP opposition to clean energy bill
« Reply #15 on: June 30, 2009, 02:48:33 PM »
if putting more money in al gore\'s pockets makes you sleep better at night go for it

personally I don\'t care where the money is going, as long as the energy is cheap and does the job
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline luckee
  • Resident Pimp
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7503
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
GOP opposition to clean energy bill
« Reply #16 on: June 30, 2009, 02:57:38 PM »
We need more nuclear plants. If it is good enough for US subs and carriers, it is good enough to power my home.
\"Booze, broads, and bullshit. If you got all that, what else do you need?\"-Harry Caray

Don\'t cry over spilled milk., It could have been Whiskey.-Me

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.-George Washington

Offline clips

  • In ChArGe..Ya DiG?!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7807
  • Karma: +10/-0
  • PSN ID: Blackgas7
GOP opposition to clean energy bill
« Reply #17 on: July 09, 2009, 06:38:43 PM »
I was just thinking how much energy the u.s. must\'ve saved on our highways and interstates when they started using those new highway signs that use some type of new reflective technology. They only been using it for about ten years now i think, but if you\'ve noticed alot of the signs on the highways today don\'t need lights attached to them for you to see them at night.

I\'m not saying that interstates still don\'t use lighted highway signs, but i think by using that new technology, it had to have cut down on the electrical energy being used at least up to 65-70%. As much as i\'ve driven on the nj turnpike, interstate 95/85/78/80/287....i\'ve noticed alot of the highway signs don\'t use lights for you to see them anymore....the new reflective tech reflects the headlights from vehicles in a way that you don\'t need lights on the signs anymore
« Last Edit: July 09, 2009, 06:43:50 PM by clips »
knowledge, wisdom & understanding..these are the basic fundamentals of life

if you can\'t amaze them with brilliance, baffle them with bullsh*t....

Offline fastson
  • Keyser Söze
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7080
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
GOP opposition to clean energy bill
« Reply #18 on: July 14, 2009, 03:01:09 PM »
Quote from: luckee
We need more nuclear plants. If it is good enough for US subs and carriers, it is good enough to power my home.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXD6Gtinvbc

:thumb:

I\'d rather get rid of them. One accident or attack and.. well its a big mess.

The future lies in harvesting what is all around us. Solar, wind, water and wave power. Huge amounts of energy stored all around us, we just need to find ways to harvest it.

Some cool experiments are being conducted in Norway utilizing osmosis (Osmotic power) to generate power. They will also be building wave generators.
\"Behold, my son, with how little wisdom the world is governed\"
-Axel Oxenstierna 1648

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk