New DOA3 pics

[Living-In-Clip]

Data and Sam pretty much already cleared that one up .

Bob did not say a TV can\'t display at 60 fps. He said higher then 60fps. He said that, due to the fact Unicorn! said he speculated the game was running at 75fps. Simple, eh? Okay, then. You are way to quick to get aggresive, so quick that you start "attacking" before you actually read the posts, I think.

As for DOA3, I personally dislike the series, but there is no denying that the game is gorgeous. The backgrounds are awesome.

[nO-One]

Damn that chick has some booty

[Bobs_Hardware]

Originally posted by Soul_Reaver
he has said it before with me in ICQ when weve talked about the ps2 slow framrate problems.  He was getting back to it in this thread.

i wasnt referring to the framerates in games, i as referring to Televisions...NTSC televisions cant show higher than 60 fps...im pretty sure PAL TV\'s cant show higher than 50 fps

BTW, i really dont think Red Faction has a frameRate problem...its no TS...but its playable, and constant

Soully says:
And you say bouncer has better graphics hey??...lets remember that game has a "BLURR" effect over the ENTIRE game in order to smooth stuff out and make it look better than it actually is. Thats really not impressive dude. Playing that game...I felt like I was losing my vision cause its used so HEAVILY.

i said The Bouncer\'s characters were better looking...i think they are much better looking, pity the backgrounds look plain and most of the time are ****ty (although some are impressive)

BTW, maybe its just the PAL version...but i didnt notice ANY blurring at all.  It was sharp as a fricken tac, like those DoA3 pics

well i think the game does look nice but i don\'t expect there to be some huge improvement anytime soon - could be wrong but thats just me

wells heres to hoping they prove me wrong