Best First-Person Shooter?

Your arguement is weak

who\'s arguing?

Originally posted by mm
who\'s arguing?

Well you\'re not stating facts so there would be nothing else to call it.

my opinion > yours

might as well accept it

Well that was fun.

Originally posted by cervantes
To be honest, if you want a decent FPS, look at the XBox. Playstation is just full of shit with the exception of a couple of games.

Halo 2 is where it\'s at. Halo 1 is better than anything PlayStation 2 has to offer. Having said that, Quake III Arena on the Dreamcast was better than all of the crap on the PS2.

And every game on the X-box is brilliant,eh?

Surely you can see why most people are saying troll.

Originally posted by Skyrider666
And every game on the X-box is brilliant,eh?
 

Nope, just saying Halo is better than anything on PS2 in my opinion

Surely you can see why most people are saying troll.

Is that everyone\'s answer to something they don\'t like? If I say something against SONY I\'m a Troll am I? You\'ll find if you read other threads I get a lot of agreement with what I say from other people from this forum. If you don\'t like my opinion, that\'s tough shit.

Even if you get agreement from other forum members, and even if you do state legitmate facts (which half the time you don\'t) the way you word every post is provoking.  You know exactly what you are doing (at least I hope to god you do) and I\'d appreciate it if you toned it down a bit.  I don\'t mind that you dislike the PS2 and their "shitty exclusives", but please conduct yourself in a little more of a mature manner.

Originally posted by cervantes
Nope, just saying Halo is better than anything on PS2 in my opinion



Is that everyone\'s answer to something they don\'t like? If I say something against SONY I\'m a Troll am I? You\'ll find if you read other threads I get a lot of agreement with what I say from other people from this forum. If you don\'t like my opinion, that\'s tough shit.

Yeah thats because other forums suck!:p j/k. We honestly couldnt care any less about what other people in other forums have to say.

Its not that you are saying something bad about sony, its just the way in which you do it.

As for the FPS thing, Halo wasnt all that great to me. It wasnt bad, but not what all the hype led me to believe. Personally in the long run, ive probably played more RF1&2 more (and yes i have both at my disposal). MoH:F...eh i wouldnt call that better either.

The difference between Halo and TS1&2 is that TS is an arcade FPS so comparing the two is like comparing two different types of FPS\'s. Its just not a good comparison.

And if my memory serves me correct, QuakeIII WAS on the ps2.

I\'ll tone down my "provocative" behaviour for the benefits of the short-tempered and easily offended...if that makes you happy?

Yes, Quake III was on PS2. Now, tell me the first thing you notice when you play the game...choppy frame-rates. You simply can\'t afford this in a game like this. Now, I wouldn\'t mind if it was constant 30 fps...but it\'s not. At times it\'s silk smooth (very nice) then it judders slightly which can become off putting.

Either way the game wasn\'t greatly welcomed. Not to mention that it wasnt that innovative in the first place. Halo or TS easily outdo it.

choppy frame-rates. You simply can\'t afford this in a game like this. Now, I wouldn\'t mind if it was constant 30 fps...but it\'s not. At times it\'s silk smooth (very nice) then it judders slightly which can become off putting.

*cough*  sounds like halo