Originally posted by Adan
EviscerationX read the last post of PSXXX and try to translate it.
PSXXX respeto tu opinion pero es precisamente para eso para lo que están los contratos. Aun y cuando las compañias salgan beneficiadas de estas ventas, la verdadera responsable y perjudicada es Sony pues si una persona va a comprar su sistema para jugar a los mejores juegos del mercado y encuentra un emulador para su pc, esta persona ya nova a comprar esta consola de Sony. Es cierto que en un principio las compañias pierden dinero al vender sus sistemas, pero solo al principio. Ten en cuenta que Sony, de acuerdo a numerosas revistas y publicaciones de videojuegos y financieras, ya ha revalorizado los gastos de desarrollo de su consola (o como se quiera decir
) y a partir de ahora está ganando con cada consola que vende.
Es mas una bajada de ventas en un sistema acaba por hundir dicho sistema, o si no echa un vistazo a la vida de DC. Por que ha dejado de producir Sega DC? Si ahora mismo hubiera 20 millones de DC y fuera tan popular como PS2, la consola de sega seguiria fabricandose y Sega se mantendria haciendo juegos exclusivos para ella.
Supon que el Bleem! hubiera salido al principio de PSX, cuando apenas si habia llegado a los 10 millones de consolas vendidas. Todo el mundo hubiera pirateado sus juegos y habria dejado de comprar el sistema. Algo nefasto para Sony, o no? Todos sabemos que la pirateria ha dañado mucho a la consola de Sony, pero esto si cabe la daña mas, pues además de hacer algo ilegal, porque yo sigo pensando que eso es ilegal, están perdiendose multitud de posibles compradores de una consola, que a la larga, como tu bien dices, a quien dañan son a las compañias y a los jugones, que ven como un sistema muere.
Espero que pronto se pase por aqui Falgarok y de su punto de vista sobre esto.
-- Translation Results by SDL International --
PSXXX respects your opinion but is precise for that for what are the contracts. (I\'m not sure). And even when the compaies they leave benefited these sales, the true one responsible and perjudicada (is that a word?) is Sony therefore, if a person is going to buy their system to play the better play of the market and finds an emulator for their PC, this person already knows to buy this console of Sony. It is certain that at first the companies they lose money upon selling their systems, but alone at the beginning. You keep in mind that Sony, according to numerous magazines and publications of videogames and financers, already there is revalorizado (??

) the expenses of development of its console (or as mean) and as of now is gaining with each console that sells. It is but a descention of sales in a system finishes for sinking said system, or if it does not throw a vistazo to the life of DC. Because have left of producing Reaps DC? If right now there was 20 million DC and was as popular as PS2, the console of reaps seguiria (Spanish...need...help...

) being manufactured and Reaps himself mantendria doing exclusive play for her. Supon that the Bleem! to have left at the beginning of PSX, when barely if habia arrived at 10 million consoles sold. Everyone there was pirated its play and habria untidy of buying the system. Something nefasto for Sony, or not? All we know that the pirateria has greatly damaged Sony\'s console, but this if fits damages it but, therefore besides doing somewhat illegal, because I follow thinking that that is illegal, they are losing a multitude of possible buyers of a console, that eventually, as you would say, to whom the damage is to the companies and to the people, that see the system die. I expect that prompt be passed for aqui Falgarok and of his point of view upon this.
Dang man...

This is hard...stop testing me so much...

I know I got a lot of misunderstandings in there, but I\'m not perfect, and Spanish isn\'t my first language so...yeah...