Author Topic: Sonic... (Read 1269 times)

« **on:** August 22, 2001, 04:25:22 PM »

I expected it to look alot better:shy:
I guess SEGA is going for a straight port:(

« **Reply #1 on:** August 22, 2001, 04:32:16 PM »

Oooh! Look @ that, the GC can handle a DC game. :rolleyes:

Or, Sonic Team managed to throw it on the GC w/o any alterations. :rolleyes:

Disappointments left and right. I think it\'s time to find a new hobby.

/ dm /

Living-In-Clip · « **Reply #2 on:** August 22, 2001, 04:34:28 PM »

:rolleyes:

They ported a DC game...Good for them.
Please, don\'t let this by an indication of Sega\'s third party support....

« **Reply #3 on:** August 22, 2001, 05:10:03 PM »

Yuck. Let\'s just hope it\'s still in the early stages.

Evi · « **Reply #4 on:** August 22, 2001, 05:30:37 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Jumpman
Yuck. Let\'s just hope it\'s still in the early stages.

Yeah...I know...*shrugs*...

« **Reply #5 on:** August 22, 2001, 05:34:19 PM »

Looks about like the dc version.:thepimp:

« **Reply #6 on:** August 22, 2001, 07:12:58 PM »

what the hell do you guys expect?

It will get better, Sega isn\'t 3DO.

Curses to all of you non-believers!!!

Meanwhile, that is one great looking DC game

Eric Jacob

« **Reply #7 on:** August 22, 2001, 07:20:44 PM »

Guys, the game looked amazing!!! on DC. Trust me, there won\'t be much they can improve on. The textures were all out crazy, tons of colors, very very very little pop up. Very fast, very fun.

Don\'t be such graphic whores...the game is a gem and you would be a fool to pass it up if you haven\'t played it already.

« **Reply #8 on:** August 22, 2001, 07:21:05 PM »

Well SA2 looked good to begin with so thats a good thing.

« **Reply #9 on:** August 22, 2001, 07:22:44 PM »

and by the way, those pics don\'t hold a candle to seeing the game in motion. They never do...

« **Reply #10 on:** August 22, 2001, 07:35:12 PM »

I have Sonic Adventure 2... So why would I want SA2 for GC? but, Nintendo, with Sonic Team under its belt will be awsome. Bitter rivals become the best of allies

« **Reply #11 on:** August 22, 2001, 07:47:39 PM »

early stages of dev would mean a straight port

After that they would work on maximizing the hardware IMO

give it time. these are the 1st batches of Screens for the GC version

« **Reply #12 on:** August 23, 2001, 11:45:43 AM »

Since porting games to GC is so easy, Sega has time to add extras to the games.

Sega and its subsidiaries have emerged as Nintendo\'s strongest third party developers. Do they believe in Nintendo\'s claims of easy software development on the GameCube? Naka-san contunued, , "I believe it\'s true. If today\'s showing is any indication, we\'ve been able to transplant Sonic Adventure 2 and Phantasy Star Online easily to the GameCube. The short translation time is allowing us to focus on adding new elements to both games."

« **Reply #13 on:** August 23, 2001, 12:11:22 PM »

PS2 - Degradement in graphics (VF4, Crazy Taxi, RE: Code V)

GameCube - Straight ports with zero upgradements (PS online, SA 2)

Xbox - Upgradement in graphics (Jet Set Future, Gun Valkrie)

Indication of emphasis and prominence for a particular console by Sega? Indication of power of each console? You betcha!

« **Reply #14 on:** August 23, 2001, 12:22:18 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Tshirts
PS2 - Degradement in graphics (VF4, Crazy Taxi, RE: Code V)

GameCube - Straight ports with zero upgradements (PS online, SA 2)

Xbox - Upgradement in graphics (Jet Set Future, Gun Valkrie)

Indication of emphasis and prominence for a particular console by Sega? Indication of power of each console? You betcha!

But did you read my post?It clearly says that Sega has time to add extras to the GC ports.Acclaim sucks they couldn\'t even port Crazy Taxi right.Capcom wanted to go for a straight port,they could have boosted up the graphic but they decided not to:shy:

Hello

Author Topic: Sonic... (Read 1269 times)