Is it me or after playing doa3, tekken 4 and vf4 look dated........

Originally posted by QuDDus



Umm excuse me cosmo he is talking about the graphics not how deep it is. This was about graphics. And I don\'t believe any of what your saying in your post. Just tell the freaking truth you have not played doa3.  Your entire post sounds like your judging screens you seen of every game on gamespot or somewhere. Which you probably are. For you to say what your saying about doa3 only proves that you have not played the game and you probably have not played the others.

The game just looks awesome. It is the best look fighter on any console. Every agree\'s it looks awesome.  And when you look at others fighters they do look dated.

you tell\'em OuDDus!!!!  Yes doa3 is a fun game as well.  This is defiently the best looking fighter to ever come out.  Thats what I was stating.

No offense ya\'ll but I\'ve played Street Fighter since I was like 15 and I\'m ready for something different.

Originally posted by EmperorRob
No offense ya\'ll but I\'ve played Street Fighter since I was like 15 and I\'m ready for something different.

Your right emperor rob don\'t get me wrong street fighter is awesome but capcom started milking it to death so yes we are ready for something new from them.

Why do we keep having threads about how " X-box\'s graphics are way better than ps2"s"?.  Of course they are better, why wouldnt they be? If Microsoft had an extra year to create it why would they release some thing that is less or equal in power to the ps2 ? That would just be plain stupid.

please stop starting these kind of threads, i have no problem admitting that the X-box has better graphics than the ps2, its about the games.

Originally posted by QuDDus



Umm excuse me cosmo he is talking about the graphics not how deep it is. This was about graphics. And I don\'t believe any of what your saying in your post. Just tell the freaking truth you have not played doa3.  Your entire post sounds like your judging screens you seen of every game on gamespot or somewhere. Which you probably are. For you to say what your saying about doa3 only proves that you have not played the game and you probably have not played the others.

The game just looks awesome. It is the best look fighter on any console. Every agree\'s it looks awesome.  And when you look at others fighters they do look dated.

VF4 looks dated? Me judging ****ty Gamesport screens...I got your answer right here. Nope, Have seen/played the game, as well as T4 and VF4 in the arcades.....Do you know me in real life troll? Nope, fraid not, so STOP assuming something that you don\'t know. Fastson is right, the people in DOA3 look like friggin plastic people, and FARRRR from real. I prefer SC\'s graphics to DOA3. DOA3 makes other games look dated? Nah, DOA3 doesn\'t look any better then SC on my dreamcast I\'m afraid.  Your entire post towards me sounds like SH!t. You can keep your **** plastic people DOA3, and I\'ll keep my Soul Calibur.  DOA3 looks far from awesome, and This is  coming from me, a ANTI DOA fan.  Don\'t believe me then queer****, because your just ASSUMING things, that aren\'t proven correct.

Originally posted by DaRkGaMeR



VF4 looks dated? Me judging ****ty Gamesport screens...I got your answer right here. Nope, Have seen/played the game, as well as T4 and VF4 in the arcades.....Do you know me in real life troll? Nope, fraid not, so STOP assuming something that you don\'t know. Fastson is right, the people in DOA3 look like friggin plastic people, and FARRRR from real. I prefer SC\'s graphics to DOA3. DOA3 makes other games look dated? Nah, DOA3 doesn\'t look any better then SC on my dreamcast I\'m afraid.  Your entire post towards me sounds like SH!t. You can keep your **** plastic people DOA3, and I\'ll keep my Soul Calibur.  DOA3 looks far from awesome, and This is  coming from me, a ANTI DOA fan.  Don\'t believe me then queer****, because your just ASSUMING things, that aren\'t proven correct.

So.............doa3 looks like crap to you?  You have got to be kidding right?  So name a fighting game that looks better.  Yes SC is a beauty as well, but compare the gemorty doa3 is pushing compared to SC, the backgrounds, the polygon count.  DOA3 out does SC graphically as well.  To me doa3 by far the best looking 3d fighter ever.........

Originally posted by rastalant


So.............doa3 looks like crap to you?  You have got to be kidding right?  So name a fighting game that looks better.  Yes SC is a beauty as well, but compare the gemorty doa3 is pushing compared to SC, the backgrounds, the polygon count.  DOA3 out does SC graphically as well.  To me doa3 by far the best looking 3d fighter ever.........

IMO, it looks crap to me man, Not trying to force anything upon you. Thats just me. I don\'t care for the DOA Series, since I\'m a pretty much big time ANTI DOA person.  DOA3 is your type of game, graphically, well, not a graphics whore, but, I find the game to not be a huge leap over the PS2 counter part of DO2 hardcore. I\'m talking character models here,  the levels are huge and lush, but where is the giant leap in visuals when it comes to the character models??  Oh well, I\'ll leave this where its at, because your entitled to like you games, as I am mine.

There is a giant leap in terms of character models--I too doubt you have played the game.  The textures on the clothing, the way they move, the joints of the fighters, the hair, the eyes, the smooth edges--it\'s all a huge upgrade.

You are closeminded and an ass I must say--you swear and cuss and name call and get way to defensive for anyone to take you seriously.  Anti-DOA?  Anti-xbox.  Console fanboy--it\'s all the same thing when talking about you.

And plastic my ass--they look no more plastic than any FF character (FMV or otherwise), VF or T4--you might as well say the xbox is 20 lbs and bigger than my television for all the shallow criticisms cast at this game.  Comments like that are an easy way to spot fanboys.

If you don\'t like the game itself that\'s fine (even though I don\'t understand that either, but please let\'s not have that debate again--I said please), but to complain about the graphics is ridiculous.

The graphics aren\'t that much of a leap... I really don\'t see much of a difference from DOA2... Only larger levels.. And ummmm.. If you like to sit 2 feet from your TV then you can notice the "wonderful texture difference".....

You know what..

I used to think the same thing. I once thought DOA3 looked a tad better than DOA2. Even when I first *played* DOA3 I thought the same.

Though I can easily say now that you are all wrong. DOA3 is leaps above DOA2 in every possible way. The lighting, the flesh of the characters, the detail in character clothings, etc. In fact, I asked a pal of mine to bring DOA2: Hardcore to check it out again, and it looked very much dated compared to DOA3. Don\'t like the game? Fine. But it looks better than DOA2 in every possible way.

I don\'t care for the DOA Series, since I\'m a pretty much big time ANTI DOA person.

That explains your thoughts right there. And if you think SC looks better than DOA3, you have problems acknowledging superior graphics. Hell, DOA2 was leaps above SC. In every way possible except textures. SC still looks awesome, but it does show its age, (and the fact that it was a system 12 port.)

Open up your eyes guys, DOA3 does look good. Now I can\'t compare it to VF4 cause I haven\'t seen it yet in person.

/ dm /

Originally posted by datamage
You know what..

I used to think the same thing. I once thought DOA3 looked a tad better than DOA2. Even when I first *played* DOA3 I thought the same.

Though I can easily say now that you are all wrong. DOA3 is leaps above DOA2 in every possible way. The lighting, the flesh of the characters, the detail in character clothings, etc. In fact, I asked a pal of mine to bring DOA2: Hardcore to check it out again, and it looked very much dated compared to DOA3. Don\'t like the game? Fine. But it looks better than DOA2 in every possible way.

Think about this though... You know how PS2 is a learning machine and developers are learning ways to make games look much better.... Now if they were to remake DOA2... And spent less time on Xbox... Think about it... It would look a little better...

And I don\'t get it why people look this close in a game at graphics...

Never play a game that has bad to kinda good graphics...:rolleyes:

I\'ve never seen DOA3 actually being played. Does the scenery bounce around every time a player gets tagged like it does in the demo? I also noticed in the demo the character detail level drops considerably during the action, not just blurring but texture and lighting effects actually go away then come back when the background quits shaking and the models aren\'t moving so much. Does it do the same thing when you play or are you too busy playing to notice? I\'m probably being too critical, maybe all fighting games play that way to some degree but it seems kind of a cheap trick to me. Just asking, the last fighter I played was Tekken3 and it\'s been a few years.

Also for the sake of the argument; the last arcade game I looked carefully at was Crazi Taxi and it seemed washed out and bland compared to seeing it running on a DC and a regular crap TV. In fact most arcade games I\'ve seen seem kind of washed out. Do any of you suppose that might have something to do with rastalant\'s impressions of VF4?

Think about this though... You know how PS2 is a learning machine and developers are learning ways to make games look much better.... Now if they were to remake DOA2... And spent less time on Xbox... Think about it... It would look a little better...

That\'s fine. I\'m sure if they re-make DOA2 on the PS2 it would look even better. But the point is that DOA3 looks much better than DOA2 right now.

Heretic,

About that bouncing thing, I really have no idea what you\'re taking about. So I guess the answer is no. The game doesn\'t have those problems. I\'ve never seen the textures blur and come back, nor have I seen the lighting pop in and out.

/ dm /

Originally posted by DaRkGaMeR




IMO, it looks crap to me man, Not trying to force anything upon you. Thats just me. I don\'t care for the DOA Series, since I\'m a pretty much big time ANTI DOA person.  DOA3 is your type of game, graphically, well, not a graphics whore, but, I find the game to not be a huge leap over the PS2 counter part of DO2 hardcore. I\'m talking character models here,  the levels are huge and lush, but where is the giant leap in visuals when it comes to the character models??  Oh well, I\'ll leave this where its at, because your entitled to like you games, as I am mine.

Sorry but I had doa2hardcore and doa3 side by side.  Doa3 model look a ton better more detail, better textures, higher polygon count.  I know thats your opinion but doa3 beat doa2hardcore graphics pretty bad.:fro:

Originally posted by rastalant

I know thats your opinion but doa3 beat doa2hardcore graphics pretty bad.:fro:

Not "pretty bad".... I\'d say... A little to a little more...