I have just written this letter to the OFLA regarding GTA3 and classifactions in general. What do you think?
-----------------------------------
To whom it may concern,
Hello, I would just like to ask as to why there is no \'R18+\' rating for videogames? I have become more interested in playing videogames over the past year or so and this is mainly because many games (particularly for the Sony Playstation 2) have now offered a more \'adult\' range of videogames; ones that are more interesting and enjoyable to play then that of ones that are targeted at children.
In the wake of \'Take 2\'s\' Grand Theft Auto 3 for PS2\'s banning, I think its about time that a \'R18+\' classifaction is implimented. Australia is one of the only countries in the world where there is not an adult rating for a videogame.
If there are adult ratings for movies and CD\'s, then why isn\'t there one for videogames? Videogames are no more widely available to children to that of CD\'s, DVD\'s and Movies, so I can not see the problem in implementing an adult platform.
I am not referring to games that have a pornographic or ultra violent streak, I am simply referring to games that may not be suitable for a \'MA15+\' classifaction. I personally believe that it is not necessary to completely ban a game that does not fit the \'MA15+\' classifaction. I believe that there just needs to be another classifaction rating that may have more strict sales policy, such as the game not being available at toy stores etc that are frequented by minors, or it shouldnt be allowed to be displayed (running) where minors are present.
This is just a thought.
REGARDS