you\'re implying what I think then calling it lame? And graphically, it didn\'t go much further...
Yes, it is lame. If you think the PS2 is at its peak, you obviously haven\'t been paying attention. And about PSX not going much further - if I do remember correctly, you didn\'t even have a PSX so I won\'t take this too seriously. But let me just tell you that the differences between Resident Evil and what launched a year later was very noticable.
Not the selling point, a selling point. meaning one of several...
Okay, a selling point then. But if you also note how Microsoft has been marketing their Xbox - it\'s definately more than just a selling point. Or at least, it should the way they hyped it.
At the moment...
Well, that pretty much ends the above then. I doubt though that the graphics will ever be that much better to really influence the casual gamer.
Reviews are just published opinions, they won\'t help you here...boring as hell?? What do you think is fun and exciting on PS2??
Of course these are opinions. Published or not, these are opinions and a lot of people read them. It is relevant and just goes to show that there are people who agree with me on this one.
Seven, what I think you\'re missing from my posts is the maybe, maybe not. It\'s basically a disclaimer and saying that I\'m keeping an open mind...which seems to be hard for a lot of people here.
That\'s okay Ginko. I ain\'t bashing you or anything - just participating in the debate and offering my opinion.
Your point though is that
they will notice it, obviously refering to the graphics capabilities of the X-box, which in your opinion has reached an end on PS2. My point is, there is no
difference that will make them notice
it. The differences aren\'t that big to make developers jump consoles. If there\'s any reason for them, it\'s development costs that may be cheaper on X-box - but as PS2 is being more explored, these costs are also dropping on PS2.
