RalliSport Challenge review!!1

Originally posted by mm

also, why on earth did they put the analog sticks on seperate levels?

Because even Fish Mutants like to play games too

hmm, i never thought of that

perhaps they appreciate the blur since they live underwater

*snicker*

IM JOKING, SHOOT ME!!1

Again, I have an HDTV and not me or any of my friends noticed this blur you are constantly talking about--and we have logged many hours with that game.  Either you are nitpicking a screen shot or you are blowing it way out of proportion.

All of these people are PS2 or PS1 owners and after the initial adjustment period, none have any complaints about the controller--admittedly, the first night there were some very vocal dissenters, but after that, it\'s been just fun.

If nothing else, I\'m glad I have an xbox for the social aspect of it.  Nearly all of PS2\'s good games are single player and once you finish a SP game, it\'s pretty much over (with a few exceptions).  The xbox\'s good games also have either 4-way split screen or system link which makes it the only console I play with friends over (besides the odd showcase of ).

No game on the market does what Ralisport does.  It looks wonderful in single player and supports 4-players.

Im totally addicted to Rallisport..... Ive bought an Xbox because of this game!

sorry you paid 300$ for a B rated game at best

if you wanna ignore the blur, thats fine
lie to me, but dont lie to yer self, thats terrible

rallisport does indeed look good, not great mind you, but good
but NOT good enough to warrant my interest

[Bobs_Hardware]

*throws porno at mm*

looks good enough for interest.. but after a while you will notice some blur..

good replay value too

*sits and enjoys it*



...

your having to defend your tastes a lot lately arent you?  

Obviously I didnt buy it JUST for that game..... why would I lie to myself about the alledged blur?  I just simply dont see it.

u do see it, yer just looking past it

thats fine, im happy for you to do so

my expectations are MUCH higher

[BizioEE]

Originally posted by mm
u do see it, yer just looking past it

thats fine, im happy for you to do so

my expectations are MUCH higher

games are not self-programmed,need time,and I\'m happy for what I\'ve seen at launch and right now...

please don\'t reply with a "wait till--insert time here" you know that new consoles need time...PSX needed time,DC needed time,PS2 needed a lot of time...etc...but if you say me you\'re always disappointed from new consoles because you don\'t see 100% of the power and all the potential at launch,well,in this case,you\'re right!:)

"teh PS2 killer" needs time?

it doesnt really matter to me regardless

xbox can have 2nd place or GC can have 2nd place

what were we discussing again?

Why is it that you are the only one complaining about blur?  I\'ve read several reviews and they all say the graphics are revolutinoary.  And they are, and I\'ve never read anywhere else that implied or suggested that the game has any graphical flaws, let alone mind-numbing or game-ruining blur.

Again,I just played the game, and I don\'t see any blur on my 36" tube HDTV.  And that\'s the truth.

Originally posted by BizioEE


PS2 needed a lot of time...etc...but if you say me you\'re always disappointed from new consoles because you don\'t see 100% of the power and all the potential at launch,well,in this case,you\'re right!:)

well the PSX needed a LOt of time to show what it could do.. and thats a Very BIG PART of the reason why the PSX saw off the.......

Sega Saturn
Nintendo 64
Sega Dreamcast

this untapped power was due to Architecture  of the Sony machines (PSX and PS2)

rather than the HALF @SSED attempts of the developers and their inability to uses whats their form the offset

:rolleyes:

Now what was that we kept hearing from the MicroFlop Zelots ?

"the PS2 is hard to develop for which means developers will flock to the X box because its Easy to develop for "

oh and "just wait till E3 2001

and "just wait to the japanese launch"


:rolleyes:

I don\'t think anyone said wait until the Jap. launch.

And show me a dev that prefers the PS2.

And the PSX had a lot more going for it than untapped power--it had 3rd party support, a very welcoming Sony (which is gone), a low price point and great launch games.  And you are wrong again, the PSX was relatively easy to develop for, it was the Saturn that was the *****.

Nice arguement.

swatch, i like ya man, but saying there\'s no blur is ridiculous



they use blur to save the framerate, why argue it?
do we really need 5 pages of posts debating wether or not you see the blur?  its there whether you like it or not
just like PS2\'s jaggies.

low price point on the psx?  yeah right, maybe shortly before the PS2 launched

Like I said, I don\'t see it.  Of course the detail is going to lessen as you move away from the camera--is that what you mean?  I see jaggies, but I really don\'t understand where you are coming from.

Anyway, the PSX was cheaper than the Saturn.