Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: New Proposed Design for the WTC  (Read 4078 times)

Offline Kimahri
  • \\m/
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3058
  • Karma: +10/-0
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #45 on: June 18, 2002, 10:20:41 AM »
For those of you who say it wouldt fit into the New York skyline...

Do you remember scince fiction books and movies of today describing futuristic looking cities that consisted much of what this building is going to look like?

I do, and i am excited for the future.  But if we just sat back and just tried to match our technology of today then our technology would not move forward.  Maybe it looks odd now, but who\'s saying this isnt the first building to revolutionize a leap forward in technology in North America. In hundreds of years the whole city could look like this building looks like.
\\m/

Offline Titan

  • Sniper Kitten
  • Administrator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16583
  • Karma: +12/-0
  • PSN ID: flightlessbeaker
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #46 on: June 18, 2002, 10:32:14 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by ROL Jamas
Anyway, Don\'t rebuild the towers, Go Memorial!

See Yuz.


You can\'t make money off of a memorial. Aren\'t you forgetting that we need a new place for world trade and financial trading? What\'s what the Twin Towers were for. I think we should just rebuild them to show that we won\'t take no crap from no terrorists. They already proved that they could withstand a 747.
Liquid Spam of The Spaminators
"That took some balls to stick a gun in his pants." -Gman
"LOL u know id fuck yu wsboth right? i would love to fuck the both of uyouy

U R FUCJKGIN FCUTE" -THX to luke and Bob

"13 year old girls sleep with older men cause they think theyre in love
13 year old boys sleep with older women cause theyd be stupid not to

Offline ROL Jamas
  • Wannabe Lapdog
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.n64cc.com/forums
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #47 on: June 18, 2002, 10:52:26 AM »
Proved it by...falling down.

Something should be built, yes. Maybe another WTC type building, but it has to be a memorial, too. This building does that, but I just don\'t see the point of building another target for the terrorists. The WTC Was a symbol of our economy, that\'s why they went after it. Just doens\'t seem logical to me as to why they would build something just like the WTC.

See Yuz.
What do Kerry Wood, Mark Prior, Matt Clement, and Carlos Zambrano have in common?

They\'re the pieces to the next great pitching rotation of our time, what else?

GO CUBS!

Offline clowd
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2187
  • Karma: +10/-0
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #48 on: June 18, 2002, 11:00:24 AM »
ive finally seen it, it looks more durable then the previous wtc,  what are the odds of these plans becoming realized?

Offline Ginko
  • hello again
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3087
  • Karma: +10/-0
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #49 on: June 18, 2002, 11:01:58 AM »
Quote
Just doens\'t seem logical to me as to why they would build something just like the WTC.


Say we don\'t build it, they\'ll find something else...

There are buildings that can withstand earthquakes and what not...I\'m sure with today\'s technology and a damn good motive to use it, that building could withstand just about anything.

Offline ROL Jamas
  • Wannabe Lapdog
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.n64cc.com/forums
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #50 on: June 18, 2002, 11:04:25 AM »
Yes, probably so, but as I looked at this, this will also be an Apartment of sorts in the middle of Manhattan. I don\'t think it would we wise to have Financial things, and a residential area in the same spot...you get something else like 9/11 that happens, and there\'s more life that is lost unecessarily. Then again, what are the odds of something like that happening again? :P

See Yuz.
What do Kerry Wood, Mark Prior, Matt Clement, and Carlos Zambrano have in common?

They\'re the pieces to the next great pitching rotation of our time, what else?

GO CUBS!

Offline Titan

  • Sniper Kitten
  • Administrator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16583
  • Karma: +12/-0
  • PSN ID: flightlessbeaker
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #51 on: June 18, 2002, 11:10:56 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by ROL Jamas
Yes, probably so, but as I looked at this, this will also be an Apartment of sorts in the middle of Manhattan. I don\'t think it would we wise to have Financial things, and a residential area in the same spot...you get something else like 9/11 that happens, and there\'s more life that is lost unecessarily. Then again, what are the odds of something like that happening again? :P

See Yuz.


I agree. There will be more casualties. Also, this building would ruin the New York skyline. Just rebuild them and stick a memorial in there.
Liquid Spam of The Spaminators
"That took some balls to stick a gun in his pants." -Gman
"LOL u know id fuck yu wsboth right? i would love to fuck the both of uyouy

U R FUCJKGIN FCUTE" -THX to luke and Bob

"13 year old girls sleep with older men cause they think theyre in love
13 year old boys sleep with older women cause theyd be stupid not to

Offline luckee
  • Resident Pimp
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7503
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #52 on: June 18, 2002, 01:27:20 PM »
Who is the idiot that said office boat? That would be even more vunerable(sp?)

Either way it goes..the WTC needs..no HAS to be rebuilt, the reprecussions are obvious. They didnt hit it to take out ppl, they did it on a much larger scale which has taken in to effect, OUR ECONOMY!!!!! Size had nothing to do with it as far as structures, otherwise they could have hit the Sears Tower..Empire state building...John Honcock building..standard oil building..Trans-Americabuilding..etc..etc..etc...

I don\'t see why it is so hard to please you memorial people. It\'s not like a building AND a memorial cannot be done at the same time. Have you that believe otherwise actually seen that land??? No, I don\'t mean media pix either. The property the WTC towers stood on was VERY large, more than enough to accomedate(sp?) a memorial AND another large skyscraper or two.

Either way it goes, NYC HAS to rebuild another large building to take care of business, not just to say "look, you cant stop us" but to continue our usually properous economy. No way around it, the offices are needed, and there is no other feasible location for them to go.
\"Booze, broads, and bullshit. If you got all that, what else do you need?\"-Harry Caray

Don\'t cry over spilled milk., It could have been Whiskey.-Me

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.-George Washington

Offline SwifDi
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9620
  • Karma: +10/-0
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #53 on: June 18, 2002, 01:34:28 PM »
The boat idea actually isn\'t that bad luckee. And with battleships that are presently surrounding the New York Harbor, I think it wouldn\'t be vulnerable at all. But a building that stretches thousands of feet in the air is just asking to be taken down.

World Trade Boat... Hehe...

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #54 on: June 18, 2002, 01:37:34 PM »
The amount of space required to make up for the towers would be incredible.  Besides, who would honestly want an office on a boat?  People would get sea sick.

It\'s also easier to sink a boat than to blow up a building.  I can see someone trying to sneak a bomb into the thing already.  Or getting into a boat with some explosives and ramming the thing.
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline SwifDi
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9620
  • Karma: +10/-0
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #55 on: June 18, 2002, 01:40:26 PM »
Haha... I know, I was kidding with the boat at first and then my twisted mind actually tried to place it in reality.

Regardless we\'ll always be in danger no matter what.

*Sails away in boat*

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #56 on: June 18, 2002, 01:43:11 PM »
I can see it now.  Within a few pages, people in this thread will be talking about World Trade Truck.
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline SwifDi
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9620
  • Karma: +10/-0
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #57 on: June 18, 2002, 01:46:36 PM »
World Trade Bus !!!!!!

( Off Topic +1 , Main Forum + 0 )

Offline ROL Jamas
  • Wannabe Lapdog
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.n64cc.com/forums
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #58 on: June 18, 2002, 01:49:13 PM »
....World Trade Hovercraft?

Ya never know, it might work :)

See Yuz.
What do Kerry Wood, Mark Prior, Matt Clement, and Carlos Zambrano have in common?

They\'re the pieces to the next great pitching rotation of our time, what else?

GO CUBS!

Offline SwifDi
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9620
  • Karma: +10/-0
New Proposed Design for the WTC
« Reply #59 on: June 18, 2002, 01:54:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ROL Jamas
....World Trade Hovercraft?

Ya never know, it might work :)

See Yuz.


Or the World Trade Blimp would be fat, equip it with countermeasures and a missile defense system and it would be unstoppable. Like some flying fortress in sci-fi films and crap! Das vould be dah shlt!1!!!!

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk