The fun begins...
Its late, so I will post replys to all your questions and statements tommorow.
You seem still to ignore the left handed right handed scientific fact and make excuses that have to be seen to believe about the other facts that I used to tear apart evolution.
\'left handed right handed scientific fact\'? What the hell does that mean?
You haven\'t posted any \'facts\' that \'tear apart\' evolution: you\'ve posted creationist tract that\'s decades (or in the case of intelligent design, centuries) old.
Who is this shadowhawk guy?
I\'m Shadowhawk. Well, Shadwhawk, but I figured someone already had the full version of my name. Also known as Eric. I\'m 22, I\'m a computer geek, I\'m an anime otaku (I like everything from NGE to Daa! Daa! Daa!, Lain to Love Hina, Vandread to Kareshi Kanojo no Jijyo), I\'m into science, I read sci-fi and manga of all types, listen to techno, console RPG scores, anime music, and some jpop. I\'m a computer technician in the local school district. I play computer and console games, usually RPGs on the console and FPS, flight sim, RTS, and simulation/civ building games on the PC. I\'ve been on the Internet since \'95; started with AOL, moved to Netcom after a couple years, and moved to a local ISP after Netcom got annoying. I\'m a regular in #ppg on EFnet, and am a semi-lurker in alt.startrek.vs.starwars, sci.skeptic, alt.fan.dragonball, and alt.atheism. I frequent kier.3dfrontier.com, squaregamer.com, and gundamshop.com.
That enough for you?
I came to the forum specifically because someone said there was a raw creationist in here. When I saw other regulars didn\'t seem too familiar with the creationist claptrap, I signed up and posted.
The score is 1-0? Your telling me he posted more thats pro evoltion then I did anti-evolution?
Quantity doesn\'t mean quality, Clowd. In fact, it\'s a standard tactic of creationists: the shotgun approach. You throw out dozens of criticisms that take you seconds to type, and you complain when not every single one of them is refuted with a page-and-a-half of typing. It works best in verbal debate, however.
Lets think straight here.
I mean you guys post your theory like its fact.
Read the Scientific American article.
In science, a theory is a widely accepted, heavily tested, continually confirmed hypothesis.
Facts are observations.
Your still yet to explain to me how life came alive on earth.
You\'re talking abiogenesis, not evolution. The two topics are separate. Evolution only matters
after life begins.
As for how it began...no one knows for sure. Biochemists have gotten close to creating self-replicating proteins based on Earth\'s previous environmental conditions.
Granted I havent posted much pro creation, but you havent any pro evolution, and ive posted a ton of anti-evolution.
Falsifying evolution doesn\'t automatically make creation true. Your anti-evolution tracts are bland, predictable, and easily refuted.
I tell you facts and you make up silly excuses for them. I dont when you ask me questions. Why do you make up silly excuses? Because you dont have an answer.
Facts like what? What excuses? What questions have you directly answered?