Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: Whew, that was a close one.  (Read 15179 times)

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #315 on: June 22, 2002, 09:14:59 PM »
what do you mean? clowd left!:rolleyes:
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline Kimahri
  • \\m/
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3058
  • Karma: +10/-0
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #316 on: June 22, 2002, 09:19:09 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by "The One" Billy Gunn
what do you mean? clowd left!:rolleyes:


ya well over the course of this post he has said that a couple of times so I still expect him to come back.
\\m/

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #317 on: June 22, 2002, 09:29:29 PM »
god this is like the fricken never ending story.
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline Shadwhawk
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Karma: +10/-0
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #318 on: June 22, 2002, 09:31:30 PM »
square: Remember, I\'m new here.  I can\'t identify sarcasm that easily, this early.  :)

Quote
I honestly don\'t know what he can pull out of his ass to cover Shadow\'s posts.


I bet I can predict it.

On Moses: "Moses did write the OT!"
On Genesis contradictions: "They don\'t show two different creation sequences; one clarifies the other."  "God let plants survive before the sun (there was no death because there was no sin yet), and it\'s day and night because God Said So."
On a corned, pillared, supported Earth: "But the Bible says Earth is round."

On misunderstanding evolution: He\'ll reiterate his earlier points on randomness, blind chance, the unlikeliness of the eye, giraffe, woodpecker, or whatever from evolving, probably toss in a tornado-in-junkyard-making-747 type argument, and say that I\'m just being fed lies by the scientific establishment.

On giraffe, woodpecker, and eye evolution: He will either not address them or will focus on one particular in them and try to pry them apart (I figure he\'ll try arguing against fully-formed valves suddenly appearing in a giraffe\'s neck vessels) and the development of a lens in the eye.

On the URLs pasted: No comment.  He won\'t visit them.
Shadwhawk
\"Any sufficiently advanced technology is often indistinguishable from magic.\"  - Clarke\'s Third Law

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #319 on: June 22, 2002, 09:33:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by "The One" Billy Gunn
god this is like the fricken never ending story.


Speaking of such...Cory, you remember how long the Word Association topic at the cc ended up getting?  I was thinking it was 62 pages, but I\'m not sure.  Now that thing was a topic! :)
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline Fayded
  • POW
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1220
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #320 on: June 22, 2002, 09:34:56 PM »
Yeah i remember. That was a great topic. Well...a great spam topic. Ahh...
[color=4682B4]
Who needs a signature?
[/color]
[/size]

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #321 on: June 22, 2002, 09:39:58 PM »
For some reason, Allashane\'s "sex with dead animals" posts keep popping into my mind when I think about that topic.

The thing grew like a page a day...for two months.
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline Fayded
  • POW
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1220
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #322 on: June 22, 2002, 09:46:09 PM »
Do you have a fetish for dead animals?
[color=4682B4]
Who needs a signature?
[/color]
[/size]

Offline clowd
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2187
  • Karma: +10/-0
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #323 on: June 22, 2002, 09:48:46 PM »
Its late,  so I will post replys to all your questions and statements tommorow.

You seem still to ignore the left handed right handed scientific fact and make excuses that have to be seen to believe about the other facts that I used to tear apart evolution.

Who is this shadowhawk guy?

The score is 1-0?  Your telling me he posted more thats pro evoltion then I did anti-evolution?  

Lets think straight here.

I mean you guys post your theory like its fact.  

Your still yet to explain to me how life came alive on earth.

Granted I havent posted much pro creation, but you havent any pro evolution,  and ive posted a ton of anti-evolution.

I tell you facts and you make up silly excuses for them.  I dont when you ask me questions.  Why do you make up silly excuses?  Because you dont have an answer.

Offline Fayded
  • POW
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1220
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #324 on: June 22, 2002, 09:54:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Clowd


...I mean you guys post your theory like its fact.  



You say that....but before you said...

Quote
Clowd

I have given facts that creation exists.



Ahh yes. You people can make of it as you like.
[color=4682B4]
Who needs a signature?
[/color]
[/size]

Offline clowd
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2187
  • Karma: +10/-0
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #325 on: June 22, 2002, 09:57:03 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Fayded



Ahh yes. You people can make of it as you like.


Dont annoy me, please.  The left handed right handed scientific FACT that I posted is FACT.  The bible talking about the earths shape,  how it is in the universe is FACT.

Offline Fayded
  • POW
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1220
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #326 on: June 22, 2002, 09:59:03 PM »
Don\'t annoy you. Ha. Is Clowd gonna get mad? I\'m just stating your mix-up or whatever you wanna call it. I could care less about getting into the argument. Buut...you are wrong. :D
[color=4682B4]
Who needs a signature?
[/color]
[/size]

Offline Shadwhawk
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Karma: +10/-0
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #327 on: June 22, 2002, 09:59:51 PM »
The fun begins...

Quote
Its late, so I will post replys to all your questions and statements tommorow.

You seem still to ignore the left handed right handed scientific fact and make excuses that have to be seen to believe about the other facts that I used to tear apart evolution.


\'left handed right handed scientific fact\'?  What the hell does that mean?
You haven\'t posted any \'facts\' that \'tear apart\' evolution: you\'ve posted creationist tract that\'s decades (or in the case of intelligent design, centuries) old.

Quote
Who is this shadowhawk guy?


I\'m Shadowhawk.  Well, Shadwhawk, but I figured someone already had the full version of my name.  Also known as Eric.  I\'m 22, I\'m a computer geek, I\'m an anime otaku (I like everything from NGE to Daa! Daa! Daa!, Lain to Love Hina, Vandread to Kareshi Kanojo no Jijyo), I\'m into science, I read sci-fi and manga of all types, listen to techno, console RPG scores, anime music, and some jpop.  I\'m a computer technician in the local school district.  I play computer and console games, usually RPGs on the console and FPS, flight sim, RTS, and simulation/civ building games on the PC.  I\'ve been on the Internet since \'95; started with AOL, moved to Netcom after a couple years, and moved to a local ISP after Netcom got annoying.  I\'m a regular in #ppg on EFnet, and am a semi-lurker in alt.startrek.vs.starwars, sci.skeptic, alt.fan.dragonball, and alt.atheism.  I frequent kier.3dfrontier.com, squaregamer.com, and gundamshop.com.
That enough for you?

I came to the forum specifically because someone said there was a raw creationist in here.  When I saw other regulars didn\'t seem too familiar with the creationist claptrap, I signed up and posted.

Quote
The score is 1-0? Your telling me he posted more thats pro evoltion then I did anti-evolution?


Quantity doesn\'t mean quality, Clowd.  In fact, it\'s a standard tactic of creationists: the shotgun approach.  You throw out dozens of criticisms that take you seconds to type, and you complain when not every single one of them is refuted with a page-and-a-half of typing.  It works best in verbal debate, however.


Quote
Lets think straight here.

I mean you guys post your theory like its fact.


Read the Scientific American article.
In science, a theory is a widely accepted, heavily tested, continually confirmed hypothesis.
Facts are observations.

Quote
Your still yet to explain to me how life came alive on earth.


You\'re talking abiogenesis, not evolution.  The two topics are separate.  Evolution only matters after life begins.
As for how it began...no one knows for sure.  Biochemists have gotten close to creating self-replicating proteins based on Earth\'s previous environmental conditions.


Quote
Granted I havent posted much pro creation, but you havent any pro evolution, and ive posted a ton of anti-evolution.


Falsifying evolution doesn\'t automatically make creation true.  Your anti-evolution tracts are bland, predictable, and easily refuted.

Quote
I tell you facts and you make up silly excuses for them. I dont when you ask me questions. Why do you make up silly excuses? Because you dont have an answer.


Facts like what?  What excuses?  What questions have you directly answered?
« Last Edit: June 22, 2002, 10:09:19 PM by Shadwhawk »
Shadwhawk
\"Any sufficiently advanced technology is often indistinguishable from magic.\"  - Clarke\'s Third Law

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #328 on: June 22, 2002, 10:01:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Clowd
I tell you facts and you make up silly excuses for them.  I dont when you ask me questions.  Why do you make up silly excuses?  Because you dont have an answer.


Go back, and read this thread over.  You are doing this more than anyone else.  People have provided an incredible amount more for the evolution side of the arguement than for the anti evolution side.  People ask you questions, you ignore them.  People make points, such as the mudskipper one before which I though was very valid, and you dismiss them or ignore them like that.  You have posted as if you have no knowledge of very simple things.  Your posts are disorganized, and contradictory.  It\'s no wonder most people don\'t even reply to you seriously.

And the thing you posted about Jews...please explain yourself on that one.  I\'m still rather pissed off about it.
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
Whew, that was a close one.
« Reply #329 on: June 22, 2002, 10:05:26 PM »
who wants to make a bet.

I bet clowds up to 1000 post by next week...

at least 100 from this thread alone.  :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk