How about an ease up on the 100x100 avatar restriction?

Its just that if you have your monitor set to above 600x800, then its really, really hard to see the avatars properly.

What if the restriction was eased up to say 130 or 150 pixels? The extra size would help alot of people eyes.

Its just a question. It might not be possible because it might not fit in with the forums teplete.

Just a thought.

if you run 1264 x whatever like me than I see barely anything

I\'m at 1024, and I can see them pretty damn easily

Originally posted by theomen
I\'m at 1024, and I can see them pretty damn easily

yeah same here, but always better to make it bigger.

speaking of that, I still don\'t know what to put on...any pointer?

I want to put a camera or some sort...:eyemouth:

Hmm.. I don\'t mind it.. But I\'m in for this change if it can be done.

Im at 1024X768..no probs here.

Bigger avatarrs = slower loading.  This forum is bad enough for 56k people as it is.  Sure, all us BB people won\'t notice the strain, but it\'s a bit much to ask for considering only recently it was allowed that you can manually change your user text and picture.  Why not be satisfied with what you have?

And racer, at 800x600, these avatarrs should be even BIGGER on your screen then at 1024, or 1152, or 1200, or 1600 resolutions.  Remember, the smaller the resolution, the bigger the picture.  I thought you were a 3D artist, this should be common knowledge for you.

And racer, at 800x600, these avatarrs should be even BIGGER on your screen then at 1024, or 1152, or 1200, or 1600 resolutions. Remember, the smaller the resolution, the bigger the picture. I thought you were a 3D artist, this should be common knowledge for you.

Yeah I was wondering about that.. 600x800 should make the picture bigger than my 800x600..

Yea, with 56k that would be killer.  Hell I remember some of the problems I had with avatars like Soulgrinds.  Well now I\'m in BB goodness.

Originally posted by luckee
Im at 1024X768..no probs here.

Same here. I have no problem whatsoever seeing them properly (if any mods sees this, shaddap, you know what I mean ).

[Bobs_Hardware]

Hey Samwise what abou... oh... sorry

Originally posted by Bozco
Yea, with 56k that would be killer.  Hell I remember some of the problems I had with avatars like Soulgrinds.  Well now I\'m in BB goodness.

My broadband is gone for at least a year. It is a sad time in my life, soon I wont even have 56k and I\'ll have to use the crappy uni computers. Now if you dont mind, I\'m going into a corner to cry

Originally posted by Ryu


And racer, at 800x600, these avatarrs should be even BIGGER on your screen then at 1024, or 1152, or 1200, or 1600 resolutions.  Remember, the smaller the resolution, the bigger the picture.  I thought you were a 3D artist, this should be common knowledge for you.

Err, yeah, hence the reason why I said it hard to see the avatars with a res higher the 800x600.

The higher the res, the smaller things are on screen... I don\'t know what you misinterpreted.

Well, maybe it would be a incentive for those 56kers to upgrade...

[Bobs_Hardware]

I have a res above 800x600.. and they\'re fine.

My modem would suffer a lot... but no prob for me really.