Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 39

Author Topic: ~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~  (Read 21458 times)

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #195 on: September 17, 2002, 04:30:19 PM »
w00t, 11-5 this week, making me 18-14 overall, not too shaby, if I pick up the pace this week, I\'ll have a good lead in my pool.

BTW: This week\'s power rankings...

http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/powerrankings
Logged
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!
Offline clowd
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2187
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #196 on: September 17, 2002, 04:33:57 PM »
With sports being as close as they are,  one play can make the difference.

Even in high scoring sports like basketball.
Logged
Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #197 on: September 17, 2002, 05:34:22 PM »
But if a team puts themselves in a situation where one play can make the difference, then the game isn\'t really in their hands.  If that is the case, then they don\'t deserve to win the game as much as you think they do.

Those power rankings are horrible, by the way.  I\'ll say it here and now, the Giants have a much better team than the Jets this year.  They also have beaten a better team, and looked better in their games.  Yet, for some reason, the Jets are ranked higher.  Go figure.
« Last Edit: September 17, 2002, 05:36:38 PM by shockwaves »
Logged
.::§hockwave§::.
Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #198 on: September 17, 2002, 07:17:56 PM »
it\'s because Vinny is boning the sportsline editor.
Logged
Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #199 on: September 18, 2002, 03:35:05 AM »
umm, it\'s gonna take more than 1 win to improve your standings...  keep up the pace and NYG could be up there.
Logged
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!
Offline ROL Jamas
  • Wannabe Lapdog
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.n64cc.com/forums
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #200 on: September 18, 2002, 04:37:52 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by shockwaves
But if a team puts themselves in a situation where one play can make the difference, then the game isn\'t really in their hands.  If that is the case, then they don\'t deserve to win the game as much as you think they do.

Those power rankings are horrible, by the way.  I\'ll say it here and now, the Giants have a much better team than the Jets this year.  They also have beaten a better team, and looked better in their games.  Yet, for some reason, the Jets are ranked higher.  Go figure.


Jets > Giants. Martin isn\'t healthy, the Secondary is young. WHY the Jets gave away their entire Secondary just for cap issues is absolutely amazing. Pure idiocy.

Tony, you ALWAYS hype up the Giants. I expect nothing more than an 8-8 season. We\'ll see in the end, though.

By the end of the season, the Cheifs will have a better record than the Giants. Just a little prediction there :)

See Yuz.
Logged
What do Kerry Wood, Mark Prior, Matt Clement, and Carlos Zambrano have in common?

They\'re the pieces to the next great pitching rotation of our time, what else?

GO CUBS!
Offline unfocused
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 483
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #201 on: September 18, 2002, 12:33:24 PM »
Trent Green to the rescue!
Logged
I have no signature...I rule.
Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #202 on: September 18, 2002, 03:15:18 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ROL Jamas


Jets > Giants. Martin isn\'t healthy, the Secondary is young. WHY the Jets gave away their entire Secondary just for cap issues is absolutely amazing. Pure idiocy.

Tony, you ALWAYS hype up the Giants. I expect nothing more than an 8-8 season. We\'ll see in the end, though.

By the end of the season, the Cheifs will have a better record than the Giants. Just a little prediction there :)

See Yuz.


The Giants played very well against two of the NFL\'s best teams.  The Jets were outplayed in their two games.  The Giants secondary is even younger, with Will Allen and Will Petterson.  I see a lot more upside to the Giants than the Jets.
Logged
.::§hockwave§::.
Offline ROL Jamas
  • Wannabe Lapdog
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.n64cc.com/forums
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #203 on: September 18, 2002, 03:33:26 PM »
2 best teams? They\'re a combined 1-3. Sure, the potential is there, but they need to prove yet again that they\'re two of the best.

Giants - 8-8. Pure averageness.

See Yuz.
Logged
What do Kerry Wood, Mark Prior, Matt Clement, and Carlos Zambrano have in common?

They\'re the pieces to the next great pitching rotation of our time, what else?

GO CUBS!
Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #204 on: September 18, 2002, 03:34:56 PM »
The Giants will be much better than last year.  They also have many times the talent of the Cheifs :)
Logged
.::§hockwave§::.
Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #205 on: September 18, 2002, 04:00:17 PM »
The Giants are pretty formidable, their defense might be in the top 3 in the NFL at the end of the season, and their offense is good enough to put some points on the board.  Collins and Barber are no Faulk and Warner by any means, but they\'re adaquit enough get some scores and let the defense win the games for them.
Logged

Offline Viper_Fujax

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4927
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #206 on: September 18, 2002, 04:08:36 PM »
i havnt been too impressed with warner this year. Faulk is performing normally(his standards, which is very good compared to others)
Logged
You\'re never too old to burn to death in a fire
Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #207 on: September 18, 2002, 04:14:29 PM »
ha! cheifs will be 1-2 after this week compliments of the Pats...

sleeper teams of the year are cleveland and New Orleans...
Logged
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!
Offline SwifDi
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9620
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #208 on: September 18, 2002, 04:48:33 PM »
Sleeper teams:

1) Bills
2) Browns
3) Panthers
Logged
Offline Luke
  • Russian Guyovich
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~
« Reply #209 on: September 18, 2002, 06:59:42 PM »
the panthers arent for real.
Logged
Helloski.
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 39
« previous next »
 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk