Too good to be true...

According to what you\'ve said, objects are made up of lesa.  Would it be possible for an object to be composed of antilesa?

Originally posted by shockwaves
According to what you\'ve said, objects are made up of lesa.  Would it be possible for an object to be composed of antilesa?

Sorry I have to delete all this info, to important to share on the internet.

....what is lesa?  I may have missed it in an earlier post, but there were a lot of them to sort through to find it  this is very interesting bossieman!!! i wanna hear more about what you are experimenting with!

Read all the posts, your question will be answered

/me stares at the screen blankly as his brains drip out of his nose...


I think I\'ll take ACE\'s route and wait for Lenard Nemoy to explain it all to me in some Discovery Channel Special in a few years.

Bossieman,i hust hope that yer theories dont make life any more difficult (i\'m still pissed at newton) coz if they do i\'m comin after you .
but if u dont mind me asking, how much energy does a lesa posses?, or do u still have to figure it out, what i mean is that since yer theory is so radical common physical quantities of today(eg. Kg, S, N,...) may not apply to it.

Originally posted by Tyrant
how much energy does a lesa posses?, or do u still have to figure it out, what i mean is that since yer theory is so radical common physical quantities of today(eg. Kg, S, N,...) may not apply to it.

Sorry I have to delete all this info, to important to share on the internet.

Bossieman,

Not to be a weenie, but could you tell me what your qualifications are in this field. It would make reading your findings have more meaning for me.

Thanks!

Ace

Originally posted by Ace
Bossieman,

Not to be a weenie, but could you tell me what your qualifications are in this field. It would make reading your findings have more meaning for me.

Thanks!

Ace

I dont know if i understand your question, this field is new, we have invented it. Its a new way of explainig physical phenomena.

Originally posted by Bossieman


I dont know if i understand your question, this field is new, we have invented it. Its a new way of explainig physical phenomena.

What is your background in the field of science? Are you just a student? Will these findings be submitted to your peers for review?

Just wondering.

Ace

Originally posted by Bossieman


Can you tell me more about this, my english is not as good as my physics, can you explain it in a way with simplier words.

My English aint good but Ill try

Archaeological dyscoveries show that humans from ancent civilizations knew techniques and knowledges still not known to ours.
1.The gold with less density that the Inkas used.
2.The non aged iron column found in Delhi
3.alchemisty
4.a)According to the Arabs,Egyptians were able to swing HUGE megaliths to the air and move them the same distance an arrow would reach if shot from a bow(The mystery to how the pyramids\' were built?).b)Father Fransisco Alvares secrettary of the Portugal Embassy in 1515 witnessed a "flying" golden stick in the Monastery of Bizan.Centuries before him many went there to worship the "miracle".It was just in the air.Not moving.The stick disappeared without a trace.c)Old South American traditions assure that in the ancient times "humans could fly and move megaliths without any effort".d)Plinios in Physics History talked about the Egyptians\' techniques that could make liths fly to the air based on scientific methods etc.They possibly knew how to use antigravity.
There are even more in Robert Charroux\'s book "the unknown history of man".

There also many other descoveries that indicate a few only insiders from the ancient times may had known the secret of hydrogen bombs,electricity, etc plus many others that archaeologists couldnt  explain even with hypothetical explanations.Descoveries that conclude to knowledge we dont know yet but was known centuries or even thousands of years before.

BTW:Some names could be wrongly spelled as the information was taken from the the greek translation of the book.

Originally posted by Ace


What is your background in the field of science? Are you just a student? Will these findings be submitted to your peers for review?

Just wondering.

Ace

Im workig on my second master, this time in theoretical physics.

Originally posted by Unicron!

My English aint good but Ill try

Archaeological dyscoveries show that humans from ancent civilizations knew techniques and knowledges still not known to ours.
1.The gold with less density that the Inkas used.
2.The non aged iron column found in Delhi
3.alchemisty
4.a)According to the Arabs,Egyptians were able to swing HUGE megaliths to the air and move them the same distance an arrow would reach if shot from a bow(The mystery to how the pyramids\' were built?).b)Father Fransisco Alvares secrettary of the Portugal Embassy in 1515 witnessed a "flying" golden stick in the Monastery of Bizan.Centuries before him many went there to worship the "miracle".It was just in the air.Not moving.The stick disappeared without a trace.c)Old South American traditions assure that in the ancient times "humans could fly and move megaliths without any effort".d)Plinios in Physics History talked about the Egyptians\' techniques that could make liths fly to the air based on scientific methods etc.They possibly knew how to use antigravity.
There are even more in Robert Charroux\'s book "the unknown history of man".

There also many other descoveries that indicate a few only insiders from the ancient times may had known the secret of hydrogen bombs,electricity, etc plus many others that archaeologists couldnt  explain even with hypothetical explanations.Descoveries that conclude to knowledge we dont know yet but was known centuries or even thousands of years before.

BTW:Some names could be wrongly spelled as the information was taken from the the greek translation of the book.

Wow, that is cool I must look deeper into that field.