Well back on topic, Iraq is more of a threat not to really use nuclear weapons on us, yet they wouldn\'t think twice to sell it to a terrorist group and do there dirty work for them. I mean as long as for the most part it doesn\'t trace back to them they are in the clear and we won\'t touch them.
I think this is more about not Iraq being able to use them, but giving them to someone that would and enjoying seeing us blown to shit.
Luckee Iran and N. Korea aren\'t as big a threat as Iraq is too us, besides we don\'t have treaties to my knowledge with either N. Korea or Iran not to build weapons, but with Iraq after we defeated them signed a whole bunch of shit saying they wouldn\'t and since they aren\'t listening we might have to do something about it.
Don\'t get me wrong I don\'t think how Bush is handling is right I think he should take a more conservative approach to it and let the U.N go through there progressions and then if all else fails go in there, but only as a last resort or if we can 100% prove that he has some types of Nuclear weapons.
I don\'t know about some of you, but if that Psycho Hussein had nukes I\'d be very afraid.