Bush did it! 9-11

No weapons of mass destruction have been found yet

Originally posted by Faithdies
Ace, we have used chemical weapons many times in our past.
We used them on Native Americans to depopulate them.

Really?  Thats funny, chemical weapons didn\'t come about until World War I.  Why don\'t you get the facts straight as well, Native Americans were depopulated by chemical weapons, rather it was disease that decimated them and it was from natural causes - not a weapon.

Originally posted by Unicron!
No weapons of mass destruction have been found yet

Unicorn what proof do you need, some western city or Tel Aviv glowing in the dark before you might acknowlege he may have weapons of mass destruction? :rolleyes:

It is very simple. When the inspectors were thrown out of the country a few years ago they had documented weapons that were supposed to be destroyed. Iraq has not explained where they are, and if and how they destroyed them. Which we know they have not!

Ace

The major problem I have with Dubbya is that he seems to WANT a war, it doesn\'t seem to matter who with, Afganistan, Iraq, maybe even North Korea, any excuse.

He\'s a brainless warmongering dolt and it surprises me that he\'s lasted as long as he has, most people with his lack of IQ die in really stupid accidents before they amount to anything.

He just needs to back the f*ck off because at this rate he\'ll just get himself assasinated.

Originally posted by Green Meanie
The major problem I have with Dubbya is that he seems to WANT a war, it doesn\'t seem to matter who with, Afganistan, Iraq, maybe even North Korea, any excuse.

He\'s a brainless warmongering dolt and it surprises me that he\'s lasted as long as he has, most people with his lack of IQ die in really stupid accidents before they amount to anything.

He just needs to back the f*ck off because at this rate he\'ll just get himself assasinated.

In case you haven\'t heard, the US was attacked... not the other way around.  As for Bush\'s IQ... in reality it is probably much higher than yours or any of ours.  If you are going to post such rabid opinions you might want to back them up with some facts.

I\'ll rest my case here.

Originally posted by Green Meanie
I\'ll rest my case here.

Thats a good substitute for an IQ test... please... like you haven\'t done something stupid in your life?  You are just fortunate enough not to have camera\'s following you everywhere.  

There are many modern day photographs of presidents doing not so flattering things.  If this is your only defense for someones IQ, you really should give it a rest.  There is nothing wrong with having an opinion about someone, but don\'t try and pass it off as a fact. :rolleyes:

What scares me is that America is quite possibly the hardest nation on this planet and I worry that the man in charge is totally disconnected from the world, the inability to name countries and world leaders from non English speaking nations was the thing that really worried me to start with. He doesn\'t fill me with confidence when he talks to the world in press conferences either, he just seems like a total moron living in his fathers shadow.

Oh well, if he levels Iraq he\'s proved himself to the old man at least.

Or he could half-level Iraq and then piss off again, kinda like what happened last time.

Originally posted by Green Meanie
What scares me is that America is quite possibly the hardest nation on this planet and I worry that the man in charge is totally disconnected from the world, the inability to name countries and world leaders from non English speaking nations was the thing that really worried me to start with. He doesn\'t fill me with confidence when he talks to the world in press conferences either, he just seems like a total moron living in his fathers shadow.

Oh well, if he levels Iraq he\'s proved himself to the old man at least.

Or he could half-level Iraq and then piss off again, kinda like what happened last time.

I didn\'t know a prerequisite for being President of the United States was being able to name every country and its leader.  If you are going to use that as a bench mark, I think it would be interesting to see how Putin would do or the leader of China.  

Its easy from a European point of view to name countries and their leaders because of the relationship between any one country and the rest of Europe, not to mention the proximity to one another.

All I\'m saying is that I don\'t trust this man to make a rational decision regarding war because he already seems set on that path.

If one day a picture is printed in newspapers of an Iraqi nuke then yes, kill kill kill. But the job needs to be done properly instead of half-arseing around with planes for a while before leaving.

I can see the same happening as before, leaving a dictator in power to torture and maim his civillians for another long 10 years.

If I don\'t see proof of these WMD\'s then it\'s a hollow war for bollock all reason, at the moment the feeling I have (if I was to put it into words) is \'would you leave a wolf to guard a field of sheep?\'.

Thats cool Green, you are entitled to your opinion and I respect that.  What pisses me off are when people try and pass their opinion off as fact.  One argument on another forum that I was recently involved in, a woman kept insisting that voters were kept away from the polls in Florida during the 2000 election.  I asked her to name a source and the best she could come up with was her mothers, brother in-laws uncle told her...  :rolleyes:

Here\'s another one for ya

Opinion is what makes the world such an interesting place.

Edit: You have to admit though, the vote count system is bloody silly!

I\'m not very confident in Bush either, but I think he has surrounded himself with some reasonably competent people to help him out in his decision making.