Author Topic: Extremely in depth GFFX review. (Read 697 times)

« **on:** February 20, 2003, 01:30:09 AM »

check it out over here
it seems the fx out performs the r9700 i most tests.

§ôµÏG®ïñD · « **Reply #1 on:** February 20, 2003, 03:07:21 AM »

it always has, just by a small margin. Also being a lot louder. Haven\'t read the review you\'ve posted, but if it\'s showing GFfx being a lot faster then ATI\'s card. I stand corrected.

« **Reply #2 on:** February 21, 2003, 04:21:50 AM »

This is a shot from the demo.

« **Reply #3 on:** February 21, 2003, 04:34:04 AM »

Thats great, but its what can be done in the game that counts.

§ôµÏG®ïñD · « **Reply #4 on:** February 21, 2003, 04:50:17 AM »

real world is were it counts.. a person without any background or little to no background doesn\'t impress me. The fact she has no hair doesn\'t help either..

« **Reply #5 on:** February 22, 2003, 03:43:51 AM »

That was a facial-expression-demo. I think it will be able to show hair

§ôµÏG®ïñD · « **Reply #6 on:** February 22, 2003, 05:03:51 AM »

lol, not saying it couldn\'t. Just saying the amount of polys used in that demo could be huge. Adding hair (nurbs) could make the demo laggy. (but i doubt it

)

Hello

Author Topic: Extremely in depth GFFX review. (Read 697 times)