Originally posted by Paul
I\'d imagine some really ridiculous things...
Imagine your PS3...running out of juice and tap the CELL chip in your TOSHIBA washing machine or microwave or SONY WEGA TV...
And connecting to other CELL chip via the internet??? Not even broadband is fast enough to transmit the data needed for that kind of computation needed for games..(unless it\'s for other purpose like recording a movie or god knows what that doesn\'t demand real-time 3D graphics)..
lol
I dont think its going to be like that.. Not now anyways.
PR mumbo jumbo
I think SONY really have gone bonkers this time round....the XBOX has shown that traditional method+raw brute force still can outperform elegant design....I just hope it doesn\'t piss off all the developers and left only a few rocket scientist to code for the thing...
What MS did was just to put together a machine that was two years newer than the PS2.
If Sony would have used off the shelf parts like MS, the PS2 would have been a lot weaker.
If Sony had used Pentium processors with nVidia graphics chips for the PS2, there is no way the PS2 could STILL compete with the xbox as its doing today.
When PS2\'s architecture was finalized, what processors were available on the market?
I remember I had just gotten my Pentium II 400MHz with a TNT2 Ultra when I read about the PS2 in a magazine.
Do you think a PC like that could output graphics like Silent Hill 3, Zone of the Enders 2, Gran Turismo 3, Ace Combat 4 ect.??
Sony’s design > off the shelf PC components