Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: What should we do with NASA now?  (Read 614 times)

Offline M4
  • Cosmic Hippo
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1264
  • Karma: +10/-0
What should we do with NASA now?
« on: March 16, 2003, 12:39:19 AM »
I think we should kill off the shuttle program and replace it with something safer, cheaper, and more modern. And then we need to build a hotel on the moon.
the earthquake hits the theater
but the operetta lingers
then the piano lid comes down
and breaks his ****ing fingers

Offline Titan

  • Sniper Kitten
  • Administrator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16578
  • Karma: +12/-0
  • PSN ID: flightlessbeaker
What should we do with NASA now?
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2003, 11:35:53 AM »
Um...the shuttles were very safe and modern. They were designed to go 100 times safely. Plus, they upgrade them like every year so they were pretty new. Columbia was hit by debris. They would not have come home even if they tried. There was no rescue possible (to my knowledge) for the Columbia. They were doomed from the start.
Liquid Spam of The Spaminators
"That took some balls to stick a gun in his pants." -Gman
"LOL u know id fuck yu wsboth right? i would love to fuck the both of uyouy

U R FUCJKGIN FCUTE" -THX to luke and Bob

"13 year old girls sleep with older men cause they think theyre in love
13 year old boys sleep with older women cause theyd be stupid not to

Offline luckee
  • Resident Pimp
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7503
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
What should we do with NASA now?
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2003, 12:13:28 PM »
Yea Titan, but there are more advanced craft out there that were scraped. SOme worked..some didnt. They can stand to upgrade.

Its just like some of the neon enthusiasts I know. They all want a SRT b/c its a 2.4litre turbo car.

Well, we have been swapping 2.4\'s in our neons for years now as well as turbos. Hell, lots of turbo 2.4\'s. But everyone still wants it from *factory*.

You cant tell me that retrofitting items into exsisting technology is better than it all from get go.

As for the program, I guess by my example, I think we need to phase out the other shuttles and work towards newer, more efficient, safer, and more advanced craft.
\"Booze, broads, and bullshit. If you got all that, what else do you need?\"-Harry Caray

Don\'t cry over spilled milk., It could have been Whiskey.-Me

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.-George Washington

Offline Titan

  • Sniper Kitten
  • Administrator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 16578
  • Karma: +12/-0
  • PSN ID: flightlessbeaker
What should we do with NASA now?
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2003, 03:30:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by luckee
Yea Titan, but there are more advanced craft out there that were scraped. SOme worked..some didnt. They can stand to upgrade.


You are right about htat, they did make new and advanced craft but the reason they were scrapped was because they couldn\'t fly or they went completely over budget and got too expensive. A prime example is the craft Lockheed Martin was making. They ran out of money before they could even get a prototype built, which is a shame because that was the best one of the new ones.
Liquid Spam of The Spaminators
"That took some balls to stick a gun in his pants." -Gman
"LOL u know id fuck yu wsboth right? i would love to fuck the both of uyouy

U R FUCJKGIN FCUTE" -THX to luke and Bob

"13 year old girls sleep with older men cause they think theyre in love
13 year old boys sleep with older women cause theyd be stupid not to

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk