Author Topic: How embarrassing could this be for the UN? (Read 779 times)

videoholic · « **on:** April 10, 2003, 06:00:19 AM »

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=31966

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,933001,00.html

They found a whole city of passageways and offices underneath a building that the UN already inspected that had very high levels of radiation.

[homer]DOH[/homer]

« **Reply #1 on:** April 10, 2003, 06:12:56 AM »

That would be embarrassing, but like so many other reports who knows what will come of it? Then again, I don\'t believe you need to send anything back to the US to confirm it is radioactive.

« **Reply #2 on:** April 10, 2003, 06:33:52 AM »

hehe. good one.

Titan · « **Reply #3 on:** April 10, 2003, 04:16:54 PM »

Gotta love the UN. Can be so useless at times

« **Reply #4 on:** April 10, 2003, 04:23:54 PM »

http://www.yahoo.com/s/75782

getting desperate

« **Reply #5 on:** April 10, 2003, 05:31:18 PM »

yeah, the UN wanted to cover it\'s errors

thanks for pointing that out, clowd

« **Reply #6 on:** April 10, 2003, 06:08:41 PM »

I\'m not trying to put up for the U.N.

If anything I think the U.N. is vulgar

videoholic · « **Reply #7 on:** April 10, 2003, 06:50:54 PM »

There are quite a few stories out there about breaking seals, etc. But they are probably all from the same source just different writers.

THere was something on the news tonight abou tthem finding a possible transport truck. I only saw the tease though, didn\'t see the story.

Hello

Author Topic: How embarrassing could this be for the UN? (Read 779 times)