Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: What would you go with?  (Read 580 times)

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
What would you go with?
« on: April 16, 2003, 02:46:52 PM »
An AMD 2500+ Barton, or a 2.4 Intel Northwood?

New egg has both of these on sale, if I remember correctly the Barton is selling with fan and heat sink at 135 or the likes, and the Northwood is at 140.  So the price difference is pretty miniscule.

I\'m also contemplating the 3000+ xp Barton, but it\'s about 340, and I can\'t see paying another 200 bucks for a 1/6 more performance.  I mean hell I could just overclock the 2500, and reach 3000 without even changing the voltage.

Offline mm
  • clyde\'s boss
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15576
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
What would you go with?
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2003, 06:18:36 PM »
easy decision, intel
\"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.\" - Clemenza

Offline EmperorRob
  • Mr Sexual Harassment
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3932
  • Karma: +10/-0
What would you go with?
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2003, 08:44:55 PM »
If you\'re planning on overclocking buy a better hsf.

The next AMD I buy will be the 64 bit whatever the name is now.

Flip a coin.
This is America and I can still pay for sex with pennies

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
What would you go with?
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2003, 09:00:19 PM »
I was thinking about the Barton because I can get it to about a 3200 pr rating on air.  But by the same token, you can get the 2.4 to about the same on air also.  However, I heard the Barton is a better gaming cpu when teamed up with a nvidia2 board.

And I\'m deffinetly going to get a better hsf, just for some reason the retail Barton is less than the OEM.

Offline THX
  • nigstick
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8158
  • Karma: +10/-0
What would you go with?
« Reply #4 on: April 16, 2003, 10:41:34 PM »
According to Tom\'s Hardware they are about dead even in performance.  Personally I\'d go with the Intel because if something goes wrong you know it\'s not your CPU. ;)

\"i thought america alreay had been in the usa??? i know it was in australia and stuff.\"
-koppy *MEMBER KOPKING FANCLUB*
\"I thought japaneses where less idiot than americans....\" -Adan
\"When we can press a button to transport our poops from our colon to the toilet, I\'ll be impressed.\" -Gman

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
What would you go with?
« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2003, 11:40:41 PM »
I\'m also eyeing a 2700tbred, at price watch they\'re only 170 bucks, and they OC well.

Offline Avatarr
  • Wise Member

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1647
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.sheepsheet.com
What would you go with?
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2003, 06:57:44 AM »
2500+ Barton, for sure.

Offline JBean
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2535
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
What would you go with?
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2003, 07:29:19 AM »
AMD for gaming

Although i\'d probably get a p4 myself, as I don\'t play many games on my comp.

Offline §ôµÏG®ïñD

  • ñµñ©Håkµ må§tË®
  • Global Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9682
  • Karma: +10/-0
  • Ǧµî✟å® Ĵµñķîë
    • §ôµÏG®ïñD'§ Electrical / Electronics shit.
  • PSN ID: SoulGrind81
What would you go with?
« Reply #8 on: April 17, 2003, 02:44:54 PM »
AMD, the cpu issue is lame and outdated.

But personally i\'d rather get a Tbred 2500+ then a Barton.
  Ǧµî✟å® Ĵµñķîë!!  

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk