Author Topic: OMG... \'1337\' Photoshop sk1llz... (Read 880 times)

« **on:** August 07, 2003, 10:02:58 AM »

This guy is good. Made from scratch with Photoshop 6 and an ordinary mouse.

GmanJoe · « **Reply #1 on:** August 07, 2003, 10:07:23 AM »

She has a mustache.

Oh...that\'s a guy.

Yeah....that is truly awesome if he/she started out with just a blank page. How does one do that, anyway? I know about the pen/tablet thingy. Can\'t be ALL mouse.

videoholic · « **Reply #2 on:** August 07, 2003, 10:15:26 AM »

What? That\'s tom cruise\'s face.

« **Reply #3 on:** August 07, 2003, 10:16:51 AM »

Tom Cruise w/ Selma Hayek (blonde hair)?

videoholic · « **Reply #4 on:** August 07, 2003, 10:17:54 AM »

Yeah, I don\'t think the guy did anything more than composite Tom and Selma\'s face on a pre-existing photo.

« **Reply #5 on:** August 07, 2003, 10:53:42 AM »

Hehe, you guys are teh stupid. I know it was done from scratch, and here\'s why:

http://www.wade.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/tutorial1.htm

« **Reply #6 on:** August 07, 2003, 10:59:54 AM »

I can\'t believe it...

videoholic · « **Reply #7 on:** August 07, 2003, 11:20:53 AM »

:worship:

GmanJoe · « **Reply #8 on:** August 07, 2003, 11:21:28 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Samwise
Hehe, you guys are teh stupid. I know it was done from scratch, and here\'s why:

http://www.wade.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/tutorial1.htm

I believed you! Samwise would never betray Master!

Kurt Angle · « **Reply #9 on:** August 07, 2003, 12:00:20 PM »

Teh guy got talent!

« **Reply #10 on:** August 07, 2003, 12:16:06 PM »

Nice work! The only thing that would lead me to believe it\'s fake is the droplets of water on their faces. Looking closely I would have said they were digitally added in, but wouldn\'t have thought the whole pic was fake!

« **Reply #11 on:** August 07, 2003, 12:28:17 PM »

If it was my picture, they\'d both have cum in their faces. :eek:

« **Reply #12 on:** August 07, 2003, 12:53:30 PM »

I\'ve been zooming and studying a little the image to check possible fakes... the result is that I think multiple filters and clone tool have been used. Some examples can be watched here:

« **Reply #13 on:** August 07, 2003, 01:00:31 PM »

Um... I don\'t see what the problem is?

« **Reply #14 on:** August 07, 2003, 01:07:57 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Samwise
Um... I don\'t see what the problem is?

The problem is the pixel resolution and blurry level. When you use clone tool, the program uses determined levels. If you don\'t adjust those levels or add noise or whatever to disimulate the clonning, then you get that signals of evidence. And don\'t tell me it\'s the jpg compression level... it isn\'t.

Hello

Author Topic: OMG... \'1337\' Photoshop sk1llz... (Read 880 times)