Author Topic: >2 cats = mad? Pfff, that\'s nothing, read this and set your faces to stunned. (Read 1392 times)

Cerberus · « **on:** September 18, 2003, 07:26:29 AM »

Link

:eek: :eek: :eek:

« **Reply #1 on:** September 18, 2003, 07:35:08 AM »

This clearly proves (sp) how cat owners > dog owners and thus cats > dogs.

Cerberus · « **Reply #2 on:** September 18, 2003, 07:39:38 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Samwise
This clearly proves (sp) how cat owners > dog owners and thus cats > dogs.

Not at all, the only reason they had all those dogs, is to keep the cats in order, they obviously started off with the cats, then found that they were a handful, and in an ill tought out plan to keep the cats in check, they bought over 200 dogs.

So, it\'s even more clear now that dogs>cats.

Bobs_Hardware · « **Reply #3 on:** September 18, 2003, 07:43:54 AM »

Well..

They still had more than 2 cats..

videoholic · « **Reply #4 on:** September 18, 2003, 07:45:53 AM »

Exactly Bobbo. This again proves my theory.
"Officers also found 16 exotic birds, five cats, two kittens, one rabbit and a chinchilla when they raided the home of Alan and Rosalind Gregson."

That is 7 cats. This person is just sick.

MPTheory · « **Reply #5 on:** September 18, 2003, 08:04:58 AM »

Why would you ever want so many animals in your house??? Who wants to bet they find out they have been eating them? That\'s the only explaination I can come up with.

GmanJoe · « **Reply #6 on:** September 18, 2003, 08:08:01 AM »

The cats place a spell on people.

Cats = evil

Cats = devil\'s pet

Cats = bad luck

Bob\'s Hardon likes his balls to be licked by cat tongues.

« **Reply #7 on:** September 18, 2003, 12:10:12 PM »

yea, i read it in the paper today, its bad, god there house must stink

Titan · « **Reply #8 on:** September 18, 2003, 01:39:33 PM »

Wouldn\'t want to be the next owner of that house. Its gonna take a lot of FeBreeze to get the smell out of that house.

« **Reply #9 on:** September 18, 2003, 03:14:59 PM »

^
Yeah it is.... my dogs first piss can be smelled in the study.

How is it illegal? I didnt read the whole article, but im guessing they were arrested? What did they do?

(I read about half)

Bobs_Hardware · « **Reply #10 on:** September 18, 2003, 03:59:57 PM »

Neglecting animals is generally looked down upon by law enforcement officials..

« **Reply #11 on:** September 18, 2003, 07:52:35 PM »

Generally? Well it is illegal, so it is looked down upon.

I didnt read the whole thing, so I didnt get to the part where they "broke the law".

Kurt Angle · « **Reply #12 on:** September 19, 2003, 12:20:29 AM »

I saw it on the news yesteday. What made it worse was the fact the the owner of the house was filmed leaving in an M3 convertible, (with her face covered). It\'s not like she couldn\'t afford to look after pets properly instead of going over the top and living in a shit hole.

« **Reply #13 on:** September 19, 2003, 12:53:25 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Spudz
Generally? Well it is illegal, so it is looked down upon.

I think he was being sarcastic.

Quote

I didnt read the whole thing, so I didnt get to the part where they "broke the law". [/B]

Perhaps because of the gazillion dogs they had in the house.

« **Reply #14 on:** September 19, 2003, 03:39:08 AM »

I would have worried about the dogs humping and creating MORE dogs!

Hello

Author Topic: >2 cats = mad? Pfff, that\'s nothing, read this and set your faces to stunned. (Read 1392 times)