Originally posted by mm
tolkien ownz? :rolleyes:
tolkien was jack shit to do with the movie EXCEPT providing a guideline for peter jackson to spend 4239857 billion dollars in production value.
lets see lotr without CG, what you have then?
i could have swore fanboy\'ism was dead
dont forget where peter jackson came from
1)Tolkien wrote a masterpiece.
2)Seeing lotr without good effects its like reading the LOTR trilogy and imagining plastic dragons, plastic looking monsters coming from power rangers or an old Godzilla movie ,stupid looking things like fire that doesnt look like fire etc.The movie had to show the beauty of the world tolkien has created.Those effects were NEEDED to SHOW the beauty of the world CREATED by Tolkien who has IMAGINATION.Do you have?I mean if everyone thought the way you do fantasy movies shouldnt exist becuase they need effects :rolleyes:
3)The actors and their roles were perfect
4)It was emotionally intense.The Matrix trillogy had tons of superbly made effects.But it lacked this.Or do effects manage this and I didnt know?
YOU BELIEVE THAT THE MOVIE WAS LIKED JUST BECAUSE OF ITS EFFECTS?
The movie was great as a whole.Not just because of its effects.