Author Topic: ~ Official NFL 2003-2004 Thread ~ Playoffs Baby!! (Read 9970 times)

« **Reply #135 on:** January 11, 2004, 07:15:49 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by QuDDus

p.s If there is a worst place than hell you\'ll get there with that pic.

Dude, what are you talking about? I\'m a Christian, this picture is awesome. Lighten up.

Oh, and go niners?

videoholic · « **Reply #136 on:** January 11, 2004, 07:21:33 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
New England was doing better than Chiefs and who got the attention? The Chiefs. Why? Dante Hall. If it had not been for Dante Hall\'s kick returns earlier this season, most people would of ignored the Chief\'s, as usual. Now their season has come to an end and all the \'bandwagon fans\' are confused and dissapointed.

Um, Priest Holmes isn\'t so bad.

« **Reply #137 on:** January 11, 2004, 07:24:01 PM »

I really think this is the year of the Eagles.

I think Greenbay was/will be Philadelphia\'s toughest challenge in the post season. Green Bay\'s been playing awesome football, have a great ground attack and an explosive passing game coupled with a pretty good defense. With Carolina, I think you\'ve got a good run game with good defense, but the Eagles will be able to focus in on the run more so than against green bay, especially if Vincent\'s back. But when it gets to the AFC, the way Indy\'s playing, that offense is going to be tough to stop.

And yes, I think Indy will beat New England. Handily.

Seriously though...how are the Eagles doing it? They\'ve had so many injuries, in so many key places (their best defensive/offensive players out for the playoffs...their best corner sitting out this game...the D-line completely banged up), but they keep winning. Hello, Houston.

Eagles over Indy in the Super Bowl

« **Reply #138 on:** January 11, 2004, 07:25:53 PM »

I pretty much everyone except the Patriots to win it at this point. I dunno, the Pats seem to be the favorite and everyone else is looking like underdogs.

I\'m totally for Carolina though, they\'ve been surprising.

And because I stated that, they\'ll lose to the Eagles. And because I mentioned the Eagles, they\'ll lose to the Pats, so I\'m screwed either way.

videoholic · « **Reply #139 on:** January 11, 2004, 07:41:30 PM »

Eagles will find a way to lose next week. They always do.

SirMystiq · « **Reply #140 on:** January 11, 2004, 10:08:00 PM »

^^^

Hopefully, I don\'t know why I can\'t stand Mcnabb\'s mom.

« **Reply #141 on:** January 11, 2004, 10:15:01 PM »

uhhh.... that game killed me. I came so close to throwing my beer bottle at my TV so many times. If we don\'t get a new defensive coordinator next season all hope is lost for us to do anything next year.

« **Reply #142 on:** January 12, 2004, 03:42:25 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by SwifDi
I dunno, the Pats seem to be the favorite and everyone else is looking like underdogs.

You gotta be kidding me. Indy will be favored this weekend. The Pats never get respect.

« **Reply #143 on:** January 12, 2004, 06:11:47 AM »

It\'s okay Hurricane, they\'re my favorite.

Living-In-Clip · « **Reply #144 on:** January 12, 2004, 06:24:29 AM »

Pat\'s will lose. Close. High scoring game.

Eagles may find a way to lose, I doubt it tho.

« **Reply #145 on:** January 12, 2004, 09:35:14 AM »

Pats are favored by 3.5 I heard...

The KC and Indy game wasn\'t as close as the final score and the stats show. If it wasn\'t for that Dante Hall KR the game would\'ve been a rout.

Also don\'t put all of the blame of the Packers loss on Favre...hes not the one who gave up a 4th and 26. I can\'t believe they let them have that after blitzing McNabb so successfully on the plays just prior that 4th down. They didn\'t blitz any LBs and consequently McNabb didn\'t have to rush his throw at all giving Mitchell time to get down the field.

btw...Im glad Swifdi didn\'t mention the Colts in that long rant of his, maybe they\'ll find a way to win in arctic New England this week.

Living-In-Clip · « **Reply #146 on:** January 12, 2004, 10:42:55 AM »

Give me a break.

It\'s 4th and 1. You try to draw them offsides, doesn\'t work. You try again. Doesn\'t work. You let the play clock run out. Why not just run a QB sneak? Good griefs....Now you\'re 4th and 6. Punt the bal.. Go into OT, then Farve does one of his famous "I hope this works" catches (which by the way, I said in an earlier post, would make or break the game) and throws it , without looking, into double coverage.

Hello? Thanks, Farve.

« **Reply #147 on:** January 12, 2004, 01:09:11 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by unfocused
Pats are favored by 3.5 I heard...

The KC and Indy game wasn\'t as close as the final score and the stats show. If it wasn\'t for that Dante Hall KR the game would\'ve been a rout.

...What?

Surely you\'re kidding. The Colts Defense wasn\'t exactly stopping the Chiefs, either. Even if Dante Hall doesn\'t take that return back, the Chiefs prolly would\'ve scored anyway.

Truth be told, the Chiefs defense was terrible, and Johnnie Morton is a virus. That\'s all there really is to say about that. Epitomy of the season.

Oh, and like I said before, Maz would be the X Factor in the game...he didn\'t play, Chiefs gave up 38 points and didn\'t stop the Colts the entire game.

See Yuz.

« **Reply #148 on:** January 12, 2004, 01:17:30 PM »

that Chiefs / Colts game was close as hell stats wise. Lookie here to see for yourself...

http://www.superbowl.com/gamecenter/teamstats/NFL_20040111_IND@KC

cool pic.... wait till next year :nerd:

« **Reply #149 on:** January 12, 2004, 01:56:36 PM »

Haha... it looks photoshopped almost... Guy has some serious hops.