Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: the grammys  (Read 2495 times)

Offline Soul Reaver
  • What\'s up duders?
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2546
  • Karma: +10/-0
the grammys
« Reply #30 on: February 12, 2004, 02:17:40 PM »
Gah 50 is average

The only song that was good on his album last year was "Many Men."

Offline Bozco
  • Tenchu Fanboy
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7043
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
the grammys
« Reply #31 on: February 12, 2004, 02:42:58 PM »
Their is better but I can sit and listen to his album straight through and not get bored.  He also bad mouths Ja and thats a definite plus.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2004, 02:44:14 PM by Bozco »

Offline Ashford
  • -=Short-Fuse Mod=-
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3184
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
the grammys
« Reply #32 on: February 12, 2004, 07:13:04 PM »
Ha Ha Ha Ha!!!

"Smite them..."
July 2002: If you had bought $1000.00 worth of Nortel stock one year ago, it would now be worth $49.00. Enron, $16.50 left. Worldcom, $5.00 left. If you had bought $1,000.00 worth of Budweiser beer one year ago, drank it all and turned in the cans for the 10 cent deposit, you would have $214.00. Based on the above, my current investment advice is to drink heavily and recycle.

Offline mjps21983
  • Red Sox Suck!!!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2833
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
the grammys
« Reply #33 on: February 12, 2004, 08:23:26 PM »
I think 50 was being a little more playful than he was being a sore loser.

Offline (e)
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6247
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
the grammys
« Reply #34 on: February 12, 2004, 11:11:03 PM »
Grammys suck.

Quote
Best Metal Performance
St. Anger
Metallica


:laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:
Think for yourself. Question authority.

Offline videoholic

  • Silly little freak
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 18034
  • Karma: +10/-0
the grammys
« Reply #35 on: February 13, 2004, 04:30:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by mjps21983
I think 50 was being a little more playful than he was being a sore loser.


That was just down right rude though.  Especially in a catagory he was nominated in.  You shouldn\'t take the limelight away from the person who has won.
I wear a necklace now because I like to know when I\'m upside down.
 kopking: \"i really think that i how that guy os on he weekend\"
TheOmen speaking of women: \"they\'re good at what they do, for what they are.\"
Swifdi:

Offline mjps21983
  • Red Sox Suck!!!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2833
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
the grammys
« Reply #36 on: February 13, 2004, 09:16:54 AM »
Well maybe it is rude to some but I think he was just trying to have a little fun, jeez no wonder people call them the Grannies, lighten up Vid.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk