I find people who are
against Moore and his movie in fact use the same tactics in describing Moore and his movie that they are criticising him for.
Moore\'s stretching the truth and presenting his side of the story to get
his point across is similar to, say.. GigaShadow saying this: "George W. Bush knew a guy, who knew a guy, who stood next to a guy on an elevator, who happened to be the husband of a girl whose cousin was dating this really, really fat man, who worked with a guy who was related to...". And yes Giga, I know it\'s called hyperbole but the point still stands.
I\'ve seen many people criticise the movie in a similar manner (on that particular point and others, albeit in a far less flippant way) and it\'s really just as frustrating as Moore\'s stretching the facts.
At some points he does try and portray Bush as a man with ill-intentions. Not
evil as such, but as a man who became president not to change the country, but to make more money for himself. These are the portions of the movie I find hardest to swallow. For the most part, however, he portray Bush as a clumsy fool who doesn\'t quite know what he\'s doing. Or rather, shows footage of Bush being a clumsy fool who doesn\'t quite know what he\'s doing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfc51/cfc51d4aa7300be94d7a2cc9c68d5d35a355160a" alt="winky ;)"