Author Topic: Cave linked to John the Baptist (Read 558 times)

Evi · « **on:** August 17, 2004, 12:57:24 AM »

Go HERE for the article.

I dunno. I just thought it was almost interesting...

Living-In-Clip · « **Reply #1 on:** August 17, 2004, 01:02:03 AM »

Quote

But some scholars said Gibson’s finds aren’t enough to support his theory, and one colleague said that short of an inscription with John’s name in the cave, there could never be conclusive proof of his presence there.

That says it all, right there.

Evi · « **Reply #2 on:** August 17, 2004, 01:05:51 AM »

Yeah...I was watching this on TV today. I just don\'t know what to think when these kinds of headlines come up. Whatever...

« **Reply #3 on:** August 17, 2004, 04:36:33 AM »

I think it could be true. He left further parts of cave untouched. And I am sure other scientist will come to further study the cave.
His findings are something to really take into consideration.

GmanJoe · « **Reply #4 on:** August 17, 2004, 04:41:40 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
That says it all, right there.

That so far, it\'s inconclusive.

« **Reply #5 on:** August 17, 2004, 12:42:21 PM »

"Gibson said he has left about a third of the cave untouched for other archaeologists to explore."

Why would you do something like that?

Titan · « **Reply #6 on:** August 17, 2004, 08:22:35 PM »

Its like Indiana Jones within feet of the Arc of the Covenant and leaving it for his rival to get it. Something fishy is going on.

Hello

Author Topic: Cave linked to John the Baptist (Read 558 times)