Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: Are you ready for some football??? da sticky  (Read 46959 times)

Offline ROL Jamas
  • Wannabe Lapdog
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.n64cc.com/forums
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #540 on: December 06, 2004, 07:21:30 AM »
It\'s hard to win on the road anywhere. The Jaguars have had some tough losses, so I wasn\'t surprised at the least as to the closeness of last night\'s game. To me, it was just an impressive win on the road against what I consider a quality opponent. 17-16\'s still a win. Nice to see that Roethlisberger can win the close ones, too.

See Yuz.
What do Kerry Wood, Mark Prior, Matt Clement, and Carlos Zambrano have in common?

They\'re the pieces to the next great pitching rotation of our time, what else?

GO CUBS!

Offline GmanJoe

  • Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12133
  • Karma: +10/-0
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #541 on: December 06, 2004, 08:25:18 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by The Hurricane
wow, they just barely beat a Jacksonville team that is .500.

Beat the Jets first and come back and talk to me.  Im a Jets fan this week. :)


Jaguars are no slouches. Steelers are also in a tougher division than the Pats and Jets. Aren\'t those two in the same division?
\"Gee,  I dunno.  If I was a chick, I\'d probably want a kiss (or more) from Durst, too.\"--SineSwiper 9/23/03 (from another forum)
Originally posted by Seed_Of_Evil I must admit that the last pic of her ass will be used in my next masturbation. She\'s hot as hell, one of my

Offline mjps21983
  • Red Sox Suck!!!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2833
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #542 on: December 06, 2004, 09:55:07 AM »
I just figured it out, not only does Warner\'s wife call into radio stations to defend her husband, she comes onto chat boards to do it too. Jeez alliswell lay off the guys nuts a little.

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #543 on: December 06, 2004, 10:09:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GmanJoe
Jaguars are no slouches. Steelers are also in a tougher division than the Pats and Jets. Aren\'t those two in the same division?


Wow you are an idiot.  The AFC East is a much better division.  The Pats, Jets, and Bills will all finish above .500.

Meanwhile, in the North, Baltimore is in jeopardy of missing the playoffs, and cleveland is playing worse than Miami right now.

AFC East > AFC North by far.  You know nothing about football.
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline Bozco
  • Tenchu Fanboy
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7043
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #544 on: December 06, 2004, 10:14:16 AM »
It all boils down to Steelers > Pats

Offline GmanJoe

  • Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12133
  • Karma: +10/-0
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #545 on: December 06, 2004, 11:08:27 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by The Hurricane
Wow you are an idiot.  The AFC East is a much better division.  The Pats, Jets, and Bills will all finish above .500.

Meanwhile, in the North, Baltimore is in jeopardy of missing the playoffs, and cleveland is playing worse than Miami right now.

AFC East > AFC North by far.  You know nothing about football.


Steelers also have had a tougher schedule, especially in the upcoming weeks compared to the Patsies. AFC East isn\'t as good as ya think it is. You watch, bitch. :)
\"Gee,  I dunno.  If I was a chick, I\'d probably want a kiss (or more) from Durst, too.\"--SineSwiper 9/23/03 (from another forum)
Originally posted by Seed_Of_Evil I must admit that the last pic of her ass will be used in my next masturbation. She\'s hot as hell, one of my

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #546 on: December 06, 2004, 11:44:10 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by alliswell
I think the Giants could have won the Falcon game with Warner and they would have lost to the Eagles no matter what.  SO they could have been 6-5.  I didnt see the Redskins game.  I just saw a few highlights.  Could Warner have made a difference?  We\'ll never know.


You\'re right about the Eagles game.  The Skins game...let\'s see.  In order to win that game, Warner would have had to have thrown 4 touchdowns...two less than he had thrown all year.  Not gonna happen.  As for the Falcons game, Eli I thouht did damn well for the defense he was playing and the way his WR\'s played.  I saw no less than 8 dropped balls that game, and that\'s no exageration at all.  Maybe Warner wins, maybe not, but let\'s say he does, and the Giants are sitting at 6-6 right now.  You said yourself 9-7 is what they\'d have to get to, meaning finishing 3-1.  They would have to win 3 out of 4 against Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Dallas, and Cincinnati.  Do you honestly think, Warner or not, that they could do that?

When you are running a football franchise, you have to look at thing realistically.  Eli being in right now benefits the team in the long term much more than Warner being in.  That\'s just the way it is.  If you think this decision was because of money or draft status, you don\'t know a lot of things about A) Tom Coughlin, and B) The Giants organization.  You clearly are not getting the full picture.

And once again, you didn\'t watch the games.  Numbers only tell you so much.  I will tell you that if you watched the games, there were no fewer than two loses that you can point to and say that Warner blew the games.  

I am a Giants fan, and I had nothing against Kurt coming in.  I want Eli playing, and I support this decision fully.  You\'re a Kurt Warner fan, not a Giants fan, so of course you don\'t support this decision.  Only one of us is unbiased here.

And as for why Eli should be starting, take a look at Carson Palmer, who started the season pretty poorly, after taking over for a very capable vet who almost led them to the playoffs last year, and has matured so much.  His game against Baltimore yesterday speaks more to why Eli should be starting than anything else I could say.
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #547 on: December 06, 2004, 02:44:58 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GmanJoe
Steelers also have had a tougher schedule, especially in the upcoming weeks compared to the Patsies. AFC East isn\'t as good as ya think it is. You watch, bitch. :)


The Patsies?  Ok, they\'ve won 26 of their last 27 games.  The Steelers played the Pats - Corey Dillon.  Dillon is the final piece of the puzzle, they will not beat the Patriots in the playoffs at home or on the road.

Good greif, you guys wouldn\'t know a quality football team if it smacked you in the face.
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline GmanJoe

  • Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12133
  • Karma: +10/-0
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #548 on: December 06, 2004, 02:51:30 PM »
And the Steelers beat a healthy Eagles. What\'s yer point? None.
\"Gee,  I dunno.  If I was a chick, I\'d probably want a kiss (or more) from Durst, too.\"--SineSwiper 9/23/03 (from another forum)
Originally posted by Seed_Of_Evil I must admit that the last pic of her ass will be used in my next masturbation. She\'s hot as hell, one of my

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #549 on: December 06, 2004, 02:53:15 PM »
You guys can keep arguing all you want, the Colts are winning the AFC.
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #550 on: December 06, 2004, 03:04:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GmanJoe
And the Steelers beat a healthy Eagles. What\'s yer point? None.


ummm, no

try playing the Eagles now.
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #551 on: December 06, 2004, 03:06:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by shockwaves
You guys can keep arguing all you want, the Colts are winning the AFC.


I seem to remember people saying the same thing last year.  And then the Colts went into Foxboro and fell flat on their face.

Offense, ya its great.  But the \'98 Vikings was better (set the single season scoring record), and they didn\'t even make it to the superbowl.
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline unfocused
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 483
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #552 on: December 06, 2004, 04:23:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by shockwaves
You guys can keep arguing all you want, the Colts are winning the AFC.


Wow I need to put this in my sig.
I have no signature...I rule.

Offline GmanJoe

  • Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12133
  • Karma: +10/-0
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #553 on: December 06, 2004, 04:41:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by The Hurricane
ummm, no

try playing the Eagles now.


And the Eagles would lose again. Good point ya got there.
\"Gee,  I dunno.  If I was a chick, I\'d probably want a kiss (or more) from Durst, too.\"--SineSwiper 9/23/03 (from another forum)
Originally posted by Seed_Of_Evil I must admit that the last pic of her ass will be used in my next masturbation. She\'s hot as hell, one of my

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
Are you ready for some football??? da sticky
« Reply #554 on: December 06, 2004, 06:19:38 PM »
Go for it Scott :p

And Hurricane, you won\'t find me saying that last year.  The Colts are infintely better right now than they ever were last year.
.::§hockwave§::.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk