Are you ready for some football??? da sticky

It wasn\'t pretty, but any time you win with the secondary the Patriots were using you gotta give credit to the Coach.

Holding the Chiefs to 19 points was big too, especially because of our dreaded secondary.  Well, I\'ll take 9-1.  Our toughest game remaining on the schedule is next week vs. the Ravens.

We win that, were on pace for 15 wins.

That was a sickening display of defense. The Chiefs aren\'t even in reach if we manage to force a fumble at the 5 yard line, and even then, we didn\'t do much with it.

3rd week in a ROW that we\'ve had a chance to tie the game with our offense, and blow it because either Trent won\'t get rid of the ball or the O-Line doesn\'t block.

3-7, and here\'s your most dissapointing team in football. Pathetic.

See Yuz.

Originally posted by ROL Jamas


3-7, and here\'s your most dissapointing team in football. Pathetic.

I dunno, I still think its the Panthers.  But the Cowboys and Redskins deserve some recognition too.

[clips]

Originally posted by ROL Jamas


3-7, and here\'s your most dissapointing team in football. Pathetic.

i seen the tail end of that game, and i must admit the chiefs completely blew that game,penalties, blown coverage and had some opportunities to take advantage of the pats...but i must say that my team (dallas) takes the title of most dissapointing team...

Not sure how you can say the panthers...absolutley decimated by injuries. Every key player from last year is injured if you think about it (ouside of Delhomme of course)...one that team is healthy, they\'d be a lot better.

I still say the Chiefs. This team had Super Bowl aspirations, and have come and played like a bunch of dogs. Simply pathetic this year. Home losses to the Panthers and Texans, road losses to the Bucs and Saints, and that lost last night where they left at least 7 points on the field...just sickening.

See Yuz.

No question that the Chiefs are more dissapointing thus far than Dallas.  Both teams have the same records, but the Chiefs have the MUCH more talented team and had higher expectations.

The Chiefs did nothing to improve their defense in the off-season.  I don\'t know how you could say they had Superbowl aspirations.  Were you expecting them to put 40 points on the board every week?

I\'m sorry but Defense should take precidence over offense, the Ravens are a prime example.  The Ravens have one of the worst offenses in the leagues, but a tip-top defense.  On the flip side the Chiefs have a tip-top offense, and a shoddy defense, one of the worst.  It doesn\'t work both ways, the Ravens are 7-3 and the Chiefs are 3-7.

Improve that defense, and then you can start having Superbowl aspirations.   For me, they are only a little bit below where I expected them to be.  I thought they were a .500 team at best.

I wasn\'t expecting too much, but I am highly disappointed that we have only mustered a 1-9 record through 10 games... I\'m embarassed to be a Niners fan at the moment... There is nothing good about them, and they show little promise for the future.

[clips]

Originally posted by The Hurricane
The Chiefs did nothing to improve their defense in the off-season.  I don\'t know how you could say they had Superbowl aspirations.  Were you expecting them to put 40 points on the board every week?

I\'m sorry but Defense should take precidence over offense, the Ravens are a prime example.  The Ravens have one of the worst offenses in the leagues, but a tip-top defense.  On the flip side the Chiefs have a tip-top offense, and a shoddy defense, one of the worst.  It doesn\'t work both ways, the Ravens are 7-3 and the Chiefs are 3-7.

Improve that defense, and then you can start having Superbowl aspirations.   For me, they are only a little bit below where I expected them to be.  I thought they were a .500 team at best.

if what you say is tru hurricane, then this philosophy applies to the colts..and they are not 3-7,...aye they are 7-3 with a horrible defense...or maybe the colts offense is that much more explosive than the chiefs...

Originally posted by clips
if what you say is tru hurricane, then this philosophy applies to the colts..and they are not 3-7,...aye they are 7-3 with a horrible defense...or maybe the colts offense is that much more explosive than the chiefs...

The difference between the Colts and the Chiefs...

Watch out for the defense. It is getting better. As long as they can play with the lead, the defense will make plays.

They\'re just as bad defensively as the Chiefs...

The problem with the Chiefs is that, when the offense actually needs to come through, it doesn\'t. The offense is starting to show cracks, and with the defense already being shit, all we have is a bunch of high-priced old sucky talent.

See Yuz.

Originally posted by The Hurricane
I\'m sorry but Defense should take precidence over offense, the Ravens are a prime example.  The Ravens have one of the worst offenses in the leagues, but a tip-top defense.  On the flip side the Chiefs have a tip-top offense, and a shoddy defense, one of the worst.  It doesn\'t work both ways, the Ravens are 7-3 and the Chiefs are 3-7.

Of course, let\'s just forget that Rams super bowl team...

Yeah but that Rams Superbowl team wasn\'t in the cellar in the defensive catagory.  Lets look at recent trends...

2004 - Patriots - won with defense
2003 - Buccaneers - won with defense
2002 - Patriots - won with defense
2001 - Ravens - won with defense
2000 - Rams - won with offense (but had a mediocre defense)

4 out of 5 aint bad.

Improve that defense and than I\'ll consider the Chiefs a Superbowl contender.

Where in my statement did I say the Colts defense was good, I said it was getting better.  The Colts are not a Superbowl team either, they will lose in the first or second round of the playoffs.

Look at the 7 years before that, and there is no team with a better defense than offense.  (although there were a couple of defensive teams that got beat up on)

I thought we were talking recent trends here.

And just so were clear, the Broncos and Packers both had pretty stingy defenses if I\'m not mistaken.