Are you ready for some football??? da sticky

[clips]

yea i agree that pass was unreal....y\'know the pats don\'t just all out blow you out..like the 00-01 rams...they constantly wear down your defense with precise passing and a balanced running attack..they\'re not really explosive,...but they are masters at wearing down the opposing teams defense and frustrates the opposing offense with a stingy D.....

even tho this didn\'t happen with the bengals,..as they did put some points on them, but for the most part when it comes to the pats..the above is the rule of law for them....

And incase anyone forgot to mention, the Bengals are good.  They would be in the playoffs in the NFC.

It is true that the Pats wear you down as the game goes one.  The Steelers do so even more.  Although a lot of \'fans\' might not like it, I honestly think that running/defensive teams are ultimately the best.  They are the toughest.  

And as for being a playoff team in the NFC making you good, the Seahawks are a playoff team in the NFC, and I would hardly call them good right now.

[clips]

yea the seahawks are collapsing the same way the chargers did late in their season last year...

....THE CHIEFS WON A GAME!

Albeit against a team that too is ravaged by injuries and their sucking secondary...but we still won!

Larry Johnson: 104 yards on *rolls eyes in Dick Vermeil\'s direction* 7 carries for 2 TD\'s. Not bad for Grand ma ma.

See Yuz.

Originally posted by shockwaves


As for your stat about the playoffs, remember, Manning is still not that old a QB, and us just entering his prime.  

I never even thought about that.  What is he 28?  Warner had his first playoff run at 28.  So lets see how he does .  Good point

One more thing.  Warner catching Eli\'s off-target pass on the sidelines: Priceless

I think Warner was still bagging groceries when he was 28.  I didn\'t think he made the Rams until his 30s?  Maybe Im mistaken though.

Nope, he was in fact 28 that first good year with the Rams.  Basically was good from age 28-30.  I know that\'s when a player is supposed to peak, but damn.  12612 yards and 98 touchdowns in 43 games in that age range with a QB rating of 103.51.  3889 yards and 10 touchdowns in 20 games with a QB rating of 76.49 outside of that age range.  Pretty strange.

I think Barry was giving him some of that "cream"

[clips]

all i have to say is..damn testicle-verde!...sheeit we had a chance to put the eagles away and throws the game ending interception..we still had time to make something happen..yea we lost, but it was 7-6 for a long time...in that aspect dallas played good...but it\'s still a loss tho...

I was gonna say something reffering to the Steelers just barely beating the Giants(the sameway Gman Joe did when the Pats only beat the Bengals by a touchdown.)  But I think I\'ll let that one pass, and just hope for the best tonight.

[GmanJoe]

That\'s coz the Steelers have had a tougher schedule than the Pansies. Announcers even mentioned that the Steelers are banged up from all their hard won games. They got bruised up badly against the Redskins, despite their record, they are a tough team. No Kendrell Bell, no Burress, no Duce....still won.

The Giants played a great game. You gotta give them credit. Then again, you don\'t give the Steelers much credit so that might be asking too much from you.

Originally posted by GmanJoe
That\'s coz the Steelers have had a tougher schedule than the Pansies. Announcers even mentioned that the Steelers are banged up from all their hard won games.

Those two statements do not equate.

However they are both true.

[CHIZZY]

Go Bills!