Originally posted by Coredweller
I don\'t think that\'s what he said at all. I think you\'re reading something else into it. The gist of his answer is that we need to attack this problem of Terrorism vigorously until it is reduced and weakened to the point where it is no longer evokes a life-threatening fear in our day-to-day lives. He\'s acknowledging that terrorism can never be absolutely eradicated, but it can be beaten down through strong effort and continued vigilence.
Not sure you get that out of thie:
___________________
\'\'We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they\'re a nuisance,\'\' the article states as the Massachusetts senator\'s reply.
\'\'As a former law enforcement person, I know we\'re never going to end prostitution. We\'re never going to end illegal gambling. But we\'re going to reduce it, organized crime, to a level where it isn\'t on the rise. It isn\'t threatening people\'s lives every day, and fundamentally, it\'s something that you continue to fight, but it\'s not threatening the fabric of your life.\'\'
If you are truly saying that Kery thinks we should irradicate terrorism so that one day it will just be a nuissance, then shit, vote for Bush. He\'s been doing just fine.