Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 48

Author Topic: NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.  (Read 40113 times)

Offline mjps21983
  • Red Sox Suck!!!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2833
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #150 on: October 17, 2005, 05:01:43 AM »
I\'m pissed too because dillon didn\'t play that f\'er is on my fantasy football team and I got jobbed because they didn\'t play him, stupid Patriots, and Hurricane is full of stupid excuses for the Patsies.
Logged

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #151 on: October 17, 2005, 05:35:47 AM »
All be the right excuses. A good excuse?

We are a team that is trying to adjust to losing our defense and offensive coaches.Instead, he wants to put it on all Bruski and Dillion, even tho\' they have lost with Dillion playin\'.
Logged

Offline GmanJoe

  • Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12133
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #152 on: October 17, 2005, 06:41:40 AM »
Young Roth needs to heal. Old Maddox, though still has SOME talent, is too inconsistent. He lost the game for us. Gyad dang interceptions!

Anyway, I totally forgot to watch football. I was playing old PSX games ysterday. :D
Logged
\"Gee,  I dunno.  If I was a chick, I\'d probably want a kiss (or more) from Durst, too.\"--SineSwiper 9/23/03 (from another forum)
Originally posted by Seed_Of_Evil I must admit that the last pic of her ass will be used in my next masturbation. She\'s hot as hell, one of my

Offline CHIZZY

  • Icky:1994-2005
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5527
  • Karma: +10/-0
  • PSN ID: chizzbot
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #153 on: October 17, 2005, 07:38:12 AM »
didn\'t watch any games either... and I broke even this week....


edit: Go Bills!:stick:
Logged
Dinosaurs were killed in the flood. -#RaCeR#
Halle Berry just loves to give me the \"Dutch Oven\". That\'s why I stopped going down on her. It pisses me off so much that I just bang her til she faints. Bitch.-GmanJoe
i just try to make my sefhappy , by beng i company of fri
Offline mjps21983
  • Red Sox Suck!!!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2833
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #154 on: October 17, 2005, 08:27:25 AM »
Looks like a consistent Qb and a good running game is all they need with that defense.
Logged
Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #155 on: October 17, 2005, 08:34:30 AM »
fine, trash me now, just like you trashed me last year, and the year before.  We will see who\'s laughing at years end...

Broncos will end up getting whooped in the first round of the Playoffs again, and Peyton Manning will end up choking against the Patriots again.  Same story, same ending EVERY year.
Logged
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #156 on: October 17, 2005, 08:47:36 AM »
We trash you, because you hide when the Patriots lose, but come runnin\' back when they win. Do I think the Colts will win? Fuck no. But you are one of those sickening Patriot fans...You make excuses everytime they lose, instead of just saying, guess what? We aren\'t the best, the other team played better.  And then, you don\'t even come up with good excuses. No one say a word if you said it was a team adjusting with new staff, but using the whole "oh if dillion played..........." thing is tired and old.
Logged

Offline GmanJoe

  • Moderator
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 12133
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #157 on: October 17, 2005, 08:50:03 AM »
That\'s right! Steelers logo is my badge of honor! Win or Lose! I\'m here to take my whippin\' or show my grinnin\'! :D

Cowboys still suck, though. :p
Logged
\"Gee,  I dunno.  If I was a chick, I\'d probably want a kiss (or more) from Durst, too.\"--SineSwiper 9/23/03 (from another forum)
Originally posted by Seed_Of_Evil I must admit that the last pic of her ass will be used in my next masturbation. She\'s hot as hell, one of my
Offline SwifDi
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9620
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #158 on: October 17, 2005, 09:26:52 AM »
Hoorah for a bye week for the 49ers! One week we don\'t get another loss!
Logged
Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #159 on: October 17, 2005, 10:06:30 AM »
i showed up and they lost... end of story.  I\'m no fair weather fan.  To be 3-3 with that talent is a miracle and a tribute to the coaching staff.  I\'m just saying, the Patriots always finish the season strong, and if they get into the playoffs they will be dangerous.  Everyone gets pissed off cause they think the Patriots always get calls in their favor which is not true, what does piss people off is how they manage to win as many games as they do every year with subpar talent.  So yeah, I was upset when they lost, but I realize that one of our few stars wasn\'t playing so it doesn\'t bother me.  In the playoffs I\'d take the Patriots over any team, end of story.

That\'s it for me, lets see if you can have a civil conversation without getting pissed at me, which you haven\'t been able to do for the fast four or five years... but hey, I have three championships to show for it, so stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
Logged
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!
Offline Black Samurai
  • RAMEN, BITCHES!!!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5073
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.zombo.com
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #160 on: October 17, 2005, 10:53:57 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
All be the right excuses. A good excuse?

We are a team that is trying to adjust to losing our defense and offensive coaches.Instead, he wants to put it on all Bruski and Dillion, even tho\' they have lost with Dillion playin\'.
I don\'t think the loss of the coordinators is the biggest reason for the Pats struggles. The fact of the matter is that they are banged up and are trying to make do with too many makeshift puzzle pieces. The system that they are using is good they just don\'t have the talent that can execute it on a consistent basis.

Finishing up that rough stretch of games and going into the Bye should help. They have time to nurse some injuries and adjust strategy. Plus it gives time for the newer free agent acquisitions to get better aquainted with the system.

The Broncos won that game because they played better than the Pats and took advantage of Key matchups. The only reason the Pats came back in the game is because the Broncos put it in cruise control. That gave the Pats a chance to steal some momentum. Still, Once Givens dropped that wide open pass for a first(and more) I knew it was a wrap.
Logged
[SIZE=\"4\"][COLOR=\"Red\"]I\'m sorry, That\'s not a hair question.[/COLOR][/SIZE]
Offline Black Samurai
  • RAMEN, BITCHES!!!
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5073
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.zombo.com
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #161 on: October 17, 2005, 11:00:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by The Hurricane
what does piss people off is how they manage to win as many games as they do every year with subpar talent.
Subpar?

The Pats had one of the best RBs, the best QBs, the best Dlineman, the best LBs, and the best SSs in football last year. If that is subpar who was above average?
Logged
[SIZE=\"4\"][COLOR=\"Red\"]I\'m sorry, That\'s not a hair question.[/COLOR][/SIZE]
Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #162 on: October 17, 2005, 02:19:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Black Samurai
Subpar?

The Pats had one of the best RBs, the best QBs, the best Dlineman, the best LBs, and the best SSs in football last year. If that is subpar who was above average?


Are you joking?

Best QB\'s... yes I agree, Brady is the best player on our team and one of, if not the best QB in the league.

Best RB\'s... ok, i\'ll even give you this one.  He was probably top 10 last year, with only LT, Alexander, Martin, Lewis, and Holmes being better...

D-Lineman...  Seymour and McGinnest are great, don\'t get me wrong, I respect what they bring to the table, but they aint getting voted to the pro-bowl anytime soon.

Linebackers... all of them are undersized and benefit from good coaching and defensive schemes.

Defensive Backs... without Law (who didn\'t play basically of last year), they were TERRIBLE.  Harrison was the make or break on that defense, but its not a one man show.  Earthwind Mooreland and Randall Gay... yeah thats some great talent there.  Tyrone Poole who isn\'t even that great looks like a stud compared to them...

I rest my case.
Logged
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline Viper_Fujax

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4927
  • Karma: +10/-0
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #163 on: October 17, 2005, 02:37:32 PM »
he didnt even mention ur DB\'s. besides harrison of course (who i think was the injury that put them over the top..he stops the run and covers the athletic TE\'s that are coming out of the wood-work these days).

Vrabel is very underrated because the D as a whole played well together, so there is no star player. undersized doesnt mean jack sh*t. The broncos LB\'s are undersized and fast as hell, but that doesnt stop them from holding LT to like 60 yards, fred taylor to 12 (week before he went nuts against cinci), and held holmes/johnson in check.

every team has their softspot. Thats why theres a salary cap so teams are even. The patriots secondary is their soft spot, broncos WR\'s are their soft spot (i know rod smith is amazing but honestly..i never really expect huge plays besides the bombs now and then to lelie). But because of that soft spot, to say that ur team as a whole is underrated just so it looks like they defeat some great odds? please..brady, dillon, branch, givens (just because therye not in the media doesnt mean theyre not great players..took a while for LT to get in the spotlight like he is now), graham/troupe, seymore, vrabel, mcginist...very good team.
Logged
You\'re never too old to burn to death in a fire

Offline Living-In-Clip

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15131
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
NFL 2005 / 2006 Thread.
« Reply #164 on: October 17, 2005, 03:29:10 PM »
Quote

That\'s it for me, lets see if you can have a civil conversation without getting pissed at me, which you haven\'t been able to do for the fast four or five years... but hey, I have three championships to show for it, so stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
That is because I never liked you to begin with. You have three championships? That is rich. You have nothing. A team you like does. Do I care that much if the Colts win? No. Would it be nice to see them win? Yes. Do I expect them to? No. Oh well.

Quote
Originally posted by Black Samurai
I don\'t think the loss of the coordinators is the biggest reason for the Pats struggles. The fact of the matter is that they are banged up and are trying to make do with too many makeshift puzzle pieces. The system that they are using is good they just don\'t have the talent that can execute it on a consistent basis.

Finishing up that rough stretch of games and going into the Bye should help. They have time to nurse some injuries and adjust strategy. Plus it gives time for the newer free agent acquisitions to get better aquainted with the system.

The Broncos won that game because they played better than the Pats and took advantage of Key matchups. The only reason the Pats came back in the game is because the Broncos put it in cruise control. That gave the Pats a chance to steal some momentum. Still, Once Givens dropped that wide open pass for a first(and more) I knew it was a wrap.


Now see that is something I can almost agree with. It was a key match up and the Patriots are banged up, but you can\'t say that it isn\'t a team in an adjustment phase. It is.

No one is saying that a banged up Patriots team is not at a disadvantage. But someone is saying that if one single player would of played, the game would of been won "hands down". That\'s pathetic, in my opinion. Not only is it pathetic, it\'s short sighted. It\'s not saying what the team is goin\' thru. An adjustment phase, that is also banged up.

And now we have the same damn person saying the Patriots win with "Subpar talent". What the hell? You have some of the most talented people in the game. Give me a friggin break.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2005, 03:30:20 PM by Living-In-Clip »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 48
« previous next »
 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk