Originally posted by Coredweller
And your brilliantly informed evaluation of this piece is based on a 220x242 pixel image. :rolleyes: You might want to avoid passing judgement on the value of things you don\'t understand.
What dont I understand?Tell us what you udnerstood that I didnt.
Its not the first time a painting like that is tagged with such a hige value without actually being worthy of that value.
I ve seen other similar occasions by first hand.
I just remembered something funny I saw once now
I went into a gallery once of an artist that made abstract art.I have to say he was pretty good.Some were extremely complicated and deserves credit for his work.
But there was also a "painting" which was nothing but a white paper that wrote "I feel fine".I checked if it had a price and it was sold at around 120 Cy pounds which is around $240
Its a stupid trend today for many...."asrtists" to do something abstract and call it an abstract painting/art.Many other artists complain about this because the others are really ruining how abstract art should have been.
Abstract art should meet some criteria that add true artistic value to say that something is a good example of abstract art.You dont do random stuff and name it abstract painting.There is no depth in this painting at all.