The game that will make you jizz. (Confirmed)

Tomb Raider is Indiana Jones.. so fine by me.

http://www.gamesradar.com/us/ps3/game/news/article.jsp?sectionId=1006&articleId=20071102164645140073&releaseId=20060314115917309058

Glad someone else called it Tomb Raider with a man.

Gee... so that would imply that Eidos would have gone through unnecessary years of lackluster Tomb Raider sales, just because they didn\'t come to the "\'conclusion\' to better change Lara into a guy ? :rolleyes:

Ugh, gamesradar is just brit scepticism on autopilot hyping their own prejudice about this game, to the masses.

If we go into the analysis of ingame character development we can even see the comparison is utterly brainless ;

Lara croft was made to appeal in the pin up way. She was the first game-babe. THAT is what made gamers turn their heads towards the TR box.

The Uncharted dude is clearly breaking from the \'special game character\' role ; the point is that gamers can identify with him because he\'s just a regular dude.

Any other argument is a prejudice dogma. Period.

did anyone call Tomb Raider "indana jones with tits" when it was released?

Here\'s an interview you might enjoy Fasty.

http://arstechnica.com/journals/thumbs.ars/2007/10/30/getting-technical-with-naughty-dog-co-president-christophe-balestra

did anyone call Tomb Raider "indana jones with tits" when it was released?

One would hope they did, but not sure why would compare a film to a game? Obviously Tomb Raider fore fronted that as a 3D genre , so anything that follows the same path, will be compared to it.

So any game with guns and a jungle is another Tomb Raider...hmmm

[Paul2]

cool interview.

really good read there unicron.

here is a small quote there:

...When we started Uncharted we were really ambitious and had no idea what the PS3 would give us. Once we got the first devkits, we realized quickly that we could do everything we had planned to. The three main points for me are the Cell, Blu-Ray and the hard drive. We’ve been using the Cell for pretty much all our systems: rendering, particles, physics simulation, collision detection, animation, AI, decompression, water simulation, etc … and to give you an idea of the power of the PS3, we\'re using only 30 percent of the Cell processor...

[Viper_Fujax]

That\'s exactly why i held off on the ps3. Has potential to be amazing...but im not going to spend 5-600 on potential.

Go god of war 3 and shadow of the collossus 2

So any game with guns and a jungle is another Tomb Raider...hmmm

Don\'t deny the comparison and don\'t act like it is a bad thing to compare the games.  Sonic was compared to Mario, but done enough to become a succesful franchise on it\'s own.  Comparing a game to a previous game is not a bad thing, so let\'s not act like saying "it\'s Tomb Raider with a dude", is a bad thing.

[Titan]

Take your time buddy because MGS4 just got delayed  : http://www.konami.jp/topics/2007/1031_1/index-e.html

Ah. The only delay I\'m glad to hear about. And this is one big delay too, thankfully. I can save up through the spring

Thanks Sam. Wow, only 30% of CELL? Pretty shocking considering how fucking amazing the game looks.

that 30% is totally PR bullcrap, I can\'t believe you\'d fall for that...

that 30% is totally PR bullcrap, I can\'t believe you\'d fall for that...

I know the exact figure might be a bit low, but its not really that far fetched. There is no way they are close to maxing out CELL this early on. EE, a much simpler processor had a major evolution between games. Jak and Daxter vs Jak2/3 for example. I suspect the difference will be much greater this time around with the 8 processor CELL.

Don\'t deny the comparison and don\'t act like it is a bad thing to compare the games.  Sonic was compared to Mario, but done enough to become a succesful franchise on it\'s own.  Comparing a game to a previous game is not a bad thing, so let\'s not act like saying "it\'s Tomb Raider with a dude", is a bad thing.

How irrelevant. Comparing to spot the improvements, welcome differences and reintroduction of important elements - or the opposite, is one thing. Pointing towards the surface only to conclude that it is basically the same game under a different skin is another. Not to mention that there was no real substantial comparison in that sentence you posted.

 I ve never heard anyone calling Sonic "another Mario, only with hedgehog instead of a plumber". And if anyone did, he was obviously wrong.

 Thats why Sonic "has done enough" to become differentiated and fun on its own merit and thus succesful.

Don\'t deny the comparison and don\'t act like it is a bad thing to compare the games.  Sonic was compared to Mario, but done enough to become a succesful franchise on it\'s own.  Comparing a game to a previous game is not a bad thing, so let\'s not act like saying "it\'s Tomb Raider with a dude", is a bad thing.

How irrelevant. Where is the comparison? Comparing to spot the improvements, welcome differences and reintroduction of important elements (or the opposite) is one thing. Pointing towards the surface only to conclude that it is basically the same game under a different skin is another. There was no real substantial comparison in that sentence you posted.

 I ve never heard anyone calling Sonic "another Mario, only with hedgehog instead of a plumber". And if anyone did, he was obviously wrong.

 Thats why Sonic "has done enough" to become differentiated and fun on its own merit and thus succesful.