listen Ethugg, it seems to me that so many people out there like yourself think only what they like is good.
I think EA doeas a really good job on most of its games.
Madden i s agreat game. NHL2001 is a great games SSX is a great game
A few EA games didn;t meet expectations but its still 1st generation PS2 games and EA is in the business of making money. They know how much money to sink inot each game franchise. They are not going to pour and extra 5 million inot a game that will never sell enough to make it back just so you can say its a great game. There\'s a balance between making masterpieces good games and going bankrupt
My logic is far from faulty, I just have a clue why some games don\'t live up or set new expectations
Alot of gamers like yourself expect nothing but perfection, but I don\'t think any gamer in this forum would spend $100 for a game to cover the resources needed to make these gems.
BUT over 2 or 3 generations of games on the PS2 EA will be able to combine the resources expended inot its games and gradually make them better and improved.
as for Pokemon and Armymen. If you we\'re the company that made these games and millions of people bought them then would you listen to the people that say they suck or would you make those games for the group of people who enjoy them.
ETHUGG you obviously have allowed yourself to believe that only the games you like are worthy. That the millions of people who like these games are idiots, which they\'re not.
Its no different then Sega Zealots or Nintendo Zealots insiting that these 2 comapnies are untouchable and nobody compares which I don\'t agree with in the slightest, so does that make me an idiot