Hideo Kojima bashes GC

Originally posted by Jumpman

Worst. Argument. Ever. Your just repeating yourself and I don\'t feel like repeating my words again.

I can see you just kind of pulled that out of your ass hence the horrible spelling and grammar in it.

I defend Nintendo because you attack them for idiotic reasons. They have no 3rd party support, they\'re too kiddy, blah blah blah your an idiot.

Read that ****ing article I posted. And if you reply with one more stupid post then your going on my ignore list. I better get it ready now because I doubt you will get smarter over the next 10 minutes...

Your the one making stupid replys.  Your just mad cause people are bashing nintendo for kiddy games.  YOur the one calling hideo names just cause he doesn\'t want to develop for gamecube.  What I\'m saying I think ps2 and xbox are going to have more and better 3rd party game than gamecube.  Plus I\'m not even impressive with the system in the first place.  To end this argument IMO I think nintendo has way too many kiddy games to interest me over xbox.

Welcome to my ignore list, raslant. Don\'t even bother talking to me another cause I won\'t see your dumb ass replies. Finally, true peaces has been restored on me...

Originally posted by raslant
I just think M$ is getting bigger games from the 3rd parties like mgsx, silent hill x, dino crisis 3, onimusha, doa3, project gothem, and sega games.  That\'s just the 3rd party games and that imo destory nintendo\'s 3rd party list of games so far.  They need to do better than just getting akklame.

To start, Sega is pledging full support to the Gamecube.  And remember that amidst filth like the wrestling games, Acclaim has produced a few gems like Turok and ASB (which systems were those released on, by the way?), and they will be porting the acclaimed (pun, woops!) Crazy Taxi series to GCN.

Anyway, if you think the games you mentioned beat down Nintendo\'s pending third party lineup, then I can\'t argue with that.  (It\'s your opinion, afterall.)  But I would like to point out that even with the Gamecube\'s 3rd-party lineup looking to come out twice as strong as the last generation, Nintendo has gone further and snatched up even more second-parties.  What this does is throw a wrench into your 3rd-party-only formula.  Nintendo will have great games coming from each of these companies, and they will all be exclusive.  (Unlike certain projects from the majority of third-parties).

-Eik

Originally posted by Jumpman
Welcome to my ignore list, raslant. Don\'t even bother talking to me another cause I won\'t see your dumb ass replies. Finally, true peaces has been restored on me...

Doesn\'t shock me anyway nintendo fanboys are the ones in most denial anyhow.  Btw has any ever told you your annoying.

Originally posted by Faithdies
All people have to go by for Nintendo so far, is there past reputation with the N64.
The N64 had more games geared towards kids than it did games geared toward adults. 2 to 3 times more.
Until Nintendo RELEASES a good amount of adult oriented games, then it will maintain its kiddy image.
That is an UNDISPUTABLE FACT.

Amen!!!!!!!!  That\'s what I have been saying.

All people have to go by for Nintendo so far, is there past reputation with the N64.
The N64 had more games geared towards kids than it did games geared toward adults. 2 to 3 times more.
Until Nintendo RELEASES a good amount of adult oriented games, then it will maintain its kiddy image.
That is an UNDISPUTABLE FACT.

Lucas Arts, Konami, Sega, Acclaim, THQ, EA Sports, Capcom, Kemco, Midway, BAM Entertainment, Ubi Soft, Saffire, Climax, and Fox Interactive have already given release dates for specific Gamecube projects (many of which will be available by Christmas).  The list by no means shows every third party in development, however, as there\'s a notable absence from such reknowned companies as Titus. *snicker*

Back on topic, the third parties are there.  Maybe not all of them, but Nintendo doesn\'t need all of them.  Why?  (Say it with me!) First and second parties! (Yay! *clapclapclap*)  That\'s right, on top of all those other companies (some of the top third parties in the world, like it or not) comes even more [great] games.  Many more.

Overall, the third-party situation is looking up, and even if it doesn\'t meet someone\'s standards, the overall gaming library surely will.

-Eik

Originally posted by raslant
Amen!!!!!!!!  That\'s what I have been saying.

Actually, you\'ve just been flaming Jumpman and going off on some obscure third-party tangent.

But let\'s say this is actually what you\'ve been saying all along:

Until Nintendo RELEASES a good amount of adult oriented games, then it will maintain its kiddy image.
That is an UNDISPUTABLE FACT.

Let\'s see... "until..." "will..."  Sounds to me like your undisputable fact is just you predicting the future.  In that case, let me give you an undisputable fact of my own! (God this is fun )  With a succesful advertising campaign, Nintendo will shed its alleged mainstream kiddy image before the Gamecube even launches.

That is an UNDISPUTABLE FACT.

(lol)

-Eik

I will be the first to admit that they are doing a much better job this time around.
But until those "mature" games get out to market, most gamers will still consider them a "kiddie" system.

Originally posted by Eiksirf


Actually, you\'ve just been flaming Jumpman and going off on some obscure third-party tangent.

But let\'s say this is actually what you\'ve been saying all along:



Let\'s see... "until..." "will..."  Sounds to me like your undisputable fact is just you predicting the future.  In that case, let me give you an undisputable fact of my own! (God this is fun )  Nintendo will shed its alleged mainstream kiddy image before the Gamecube even launches with a succesful advertising campaign.

That is an UNDISPUTABLE FACT.



-Eik

I been saying that too.  Until nintendo changes there image they will be known as a kiddy company.  Yes that is a fact.

Originally posted by raslant
I been saying that too.  Until nintendo changes there image they will be known as a kiddy company.  Yes that is a fact.

If we agree that their image is "kiddy," then you\'re right.

I disagree with that, personally, but I\'m not going to speak for the unspoken majority (they can speak for themselves, though likely they won\'t, being unspoken and everything).  Besides, I think you might be right about that one.

PS. Note to jumpman: that\'s what the end of a debate looks like. ;]

-Eik

Originally posted by AlteredBeast
actually disney DID release an NC-17 movie. it was called "The Priest" about a gay priest who does a bunch of nasty stuff. It was released under Touchstone pics though.

I know, thats what I was saying. Disney wouldn\'t release it under the "Disney" name because they would tarnish their family image. Thats what Nintendo needs to do, start a new development house ala Touchstone.