Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
Yeah, it would. \'Cept if you are carrying a portable system around and you drop it the chances of the analog stick breaking are very high.
By the way, you can\'t backlight the GBA, because of the SHARPLCD. as it is reflective only, any light that goes thru the LCD will just fade ("Wash") the pixels out.
Well, the neo geo pocket color had an analog stick instead of a digital D-Pad.
I\'ve never heard of anyone breaking their\'s . . . although I must admit, I always imagined a good fall would be all she wrote for the controls . . .
And no, you can\'t backlight the reflective screen. However, a light source ould be placed above the screen, under that crappy protective plate, which would sove the problem nicely. Still, that falls under the battery drain issues. :boom:
On the topic of playing 3d games on a small screen.A few years ago, while spending time with my relatives, I needed some gaming to help kill the time. I brought my PSX, but had no TV I could hook it up to. So, being the clever person I am, I hooked the system up to my view cam . . .
I imagine someone at Sony did the same and came up with the PSone screen add on years latter.Anyway, playing games on this screen was possible and provided much needed entertainment. But, it wasn\'t something I would want to be forced to do as my only means of playing the console.
Most games were just bothersome to play in 3D on such a small screen, which is by far, larger than any portable screen to date. The problem was the games weren\'t intended to viewed on such a small scale. Too much was on screen at once, and . . .
oh hell, it just wasn\'t that great. Go try it for yourself.
I spent the whole time Playing Castlevania SOTN, which played like a dream. And why did it play so well? Because the on screen graphics we\'re a fixed size, highly detailed and smooth.
Sure we could have 3D games on a portable, but we would need a screen at least twice as large, which would have to be backlit. Otherwise, the experience is more trouble than its worth. Currently, the technology to do so is too costly.
I don\'t know about you guys, but I don\'t want to have a technological step forward which coppies the mistakes of the past. The days of $300.00 portables which eat up batteries like candy are gone, and I\'d like it to stay that way.
Frodo