Personally, I\'d rather see either Sega or Sony come out the leader in this generation, with the Xbox and NGC taking up a sizeable marketshare as well. Since we can count Sega out, things seem to be going as well as I could have hoped so far. Competition is good, we\'ve all seen what a monopoly can do to the handheld market.. why would you want the same thing in the console market?
BTW, GManJoe.. that example dosen\'t prove Sony\'s "Loyalty". The ONLY reason why the PS2 is backwards compatable with the PS1 is because Sony needed a good - cheap - I/O chip for the PS2. For such a minimal task, the PS1\'s core processor worked wonderfully.. and since they are kicking those out in mass quantities for pennies on the chip, it just made good buisness sence. Making the few alterations for backwards compatability was just a ploy to get more gamers to buy the PS2 due to the PSX\'s massive userbase. If they had been TRUELY serious about extending the life of your PSX library, they would have included graphical updates beyond simple texture smoothing.
A nice feature, but don\'t think they gave it to you out of the kindness of their hearts.
Sega, on the otherhand, would have had to totally redesign the Saturn with a cartridge slot + converter to accomodate the Genesis/32x Carts. Since the SegaCD is an ENHANCEMENT to the Genesis, they would have had to include Backwards compatability for the Genny into the Saturn.. and why should they spend the cash (which they didn\'t have) for a add-on which sold pretty pitifully when all was said and done?