Can someone here prove me wrong? Black holes

I´m going to present some Ideas that I have. I know most of the people here have accepted the existance of black holes, but all people have not, I´m one of those people.
As a scientist I have to be absolutely sure before I can call something a fact.
When I find things in a theory that makes no sence I have too put all my imagination and knowledge to the test before I can accept the theory.
I have been studying some very basic problems with black holes and I need to post them to all you. I hope nobody flames and tries to make good answers.

Ok, here we go.

A object that has a ecape velocity of c creates a black hole. the equation for the radius of a black hole is v=(2GM/r)^0.5, if v=c we have a black hole.
I´m going to use a black hole with the radius of our solarsystem, the mass of the big hole would be about 3.4E39, the density of the black hole would be 7Kg/m^3, that is a very low number but it doesnt matter.
According to all litterature it would be impossible for anything to escape this object, not even light.
When I bring materia towards the eventhorizon a interesting phenomena appears that I have not been able to find a answer to anywhere.
The object that I bring towards the blackhole has to affect the escape velocity of the blackhole(the escape velocity from earth is lower in the direction of the Moon). A particel(a electron) that is inside the blackhole very close to the event horizon in the same direction as I bring the materia can now escape from the black hole because the escapevelocity is lower than c here. If this object I bring to the blackhole is a giant magnet this magnet could catch the electron. After I have collected the electron the mass of the black holes goes down and we have a big mass that has a escapevelocity below c.
I really would like evidence that this is not true. Belive me I have tried but noone have been able to solve this puzzle.
And what if I bring a "lot"materia close to a black hole, this materia would make the escapevelocity of the black hole way under c and the blackhole would start to shine again.

Copyright Leif Sandvik 2002

Thoughts guys??

Wouldn\'t it be impossible to retrieve said materia from the blackhole, if it was in close enough proximity to affect the c?

Wouldn\'t the materia become a part of the blackhole?

Originally posted by CygnusXI
Wouldn\'t it be impossible to retrieve said materia from the blackhole, if it was in close enough proximity to affect the c?

Wouldn\'t the materia become a part of the blackhole?

No , not before the materia is behind the eventhorizon.
What I am saying is that I can take out anything from a black hole. The escapevelocity would go under c and no physical law prefents me from picking the electron (or anything) out of the black hole. I know its hard to belive but just think about it.

iformation: c= speed of light (299792458 m/s)
escapevelocity: The speed you have to give an object to make the object not falling down again. For Earth the escapevelocity is 11.2 km/s. Anything you throw up in the sky with that speed will necer come down again. If you throw the object with a smaller speed the object will fall down again.

Well, I personally know very little about black holes and the like, but I think I can offer solutions that seem possible from just thinking the situation through.  A black hole is first created when the escape velocity is equal to c.  However, since all matter pulls other matter to it, with each object having some level of gravity, wouldn\'t the escape velocity rise above c as the black hole progresses and more is drawn into it?  If so, I\'d think that minor drops in the escape velocity as materia approached the event horizon would not make enough of a difference to stop the black hole from progressing.

I also don\'t see how you would manage to bring materia that close in the matter described.  I\'d assume that an object near the event horizon would be moving towards the black hole at a very high speed.  Perhaps the object were to momentarily drop the escape velocity to below c as it is just outside the event horizon.  It would still be drawn in though, by the gravity of the mass in what was once a black hole, and by it\'s own momentum.  Once it is within what had been the event horizon, wouldn\'t the escape velocity return to c, and the black hole would begin once again?  That seems possible to me too, since the time it would stop for would be such a small amount of time.

These are just guesses I have based mainly on just my own reasoning.  The first one is what I would go with if I had to take a random stab at it.  It could be one or the other, or both, or neither.

Originally posted by shockwaves
wouldn\'t the escape velocity rise above c as the black hole progresses and more is drawn into it?  

No the escapevelocity doesn´t go over c, what happens is that the radius of the blackhole becomes bigger when the mass gets bigger.

I also don\'t see how you would manage to bring materia that close in the matter described. I\'d assume that an object near the event horizon would be moving towards the black hole at a very high speed

It doesn´t matter, if the object I use have bigger mass than the black hole, the black hole would accelerationg towards the mass.

"Perhaps the object were to momentarily drop the escape velocity to below c as it is just outside the event horizon"

This is very true, and during this time a object inside the blackhole can escape, it doesn´t matter if it´s almost impossible, if it works in theory you can do it in practise.[

Out of curiosity, are blackholes thought to go on forever?  I mean, maybe it is just something like this that stops a black hole from progressing at a certain point.

Also, I thought that mass effects gravity, and gravity effects escape velocity.  Unless I\'m missing something, wouldn\'t more mass lead to a higher escape velocity?

Well if the object were already moving toward the black hole, and it was trying to escape with the help of another objects gravity, it wouldn\'t work.  First of all if both objects are of the same mass, in theory they would meet in the middle of their distance apart, secondly and most importantly, the theory of reletivity.  The electron is reletive to the object, just like how you can\'t jump off a falling elevator.

Oh btw, what type of black hole are we talking about?  Because if we\'re talking about a Kerr black hole, the event horizon doesn\'t exist, due to the law of conservation of angular momentum, producing a naked singularity.  Which means there would be no gravitational pull, up to the singularity.

BTW once again, I\'m just rambling here....

Originally posted by shockwaves
Out of curiosity, are blackholes thought to go on forever?  I mean, maybe it is just something like this that stops a black hole from progressing at a certain point.

Also, I thought that mass effects gravity, and gravity effects escape velocity.  Unless I\'m missing something, wouldn\'t more mass lead to a higher escape velocity?

First question: No a blackhole doesn´t last forever, it loses mass throw a process called Hawking radiation (I dont like the theory but....)

Second question: Mass affects gravity, gravity affects escapevelocity, but escape velocity depends on the radius also.
If we thrink Earth the escape velocity would get higher even though the mass is intact.

Originally posted by theomen
Oh btw, what type of black hole are we talking about?  Because if we\'re talking about a Kerr black hole, the event horizon doesn\'t exist, due to the law of conservation of angular momentum, producing a naked singularity.  Which means there would be no gravitational pull, up to the singularity.

Ok, now the conversation is over my head  Thanks a lot theomen!

Originally posted by theomen
Well if the object were already moving toward the black hole, and it was trying to escape with the help of another objects gravity, it wouldn\'t work.  First of all if both objects are of the same mass, in theory they would meet in the middle of their distance apart, secondly and most importantly, the theory of reletivity.  The electron is reletive to the object, just like how you can\'t jump off a falling elevator.

Oh btw, what type of black hole are we talking about?  Because if we\'re talking about a Kerr black hole, the event horizon doesn\'t exist, due to the law of conservation of angular momentum, producing a naked singularity.  Which means there would be no gravitational pull, up to the singularity.

BTW once again, I\'m just rambling here....

You have a little missunderstanding here.
I´m using the object to get the escape velocity below c.
Even if this object is far away from the black hole the escapevelocity would be below c at the blackhole in direction towards the object. This means that the escapevelocity would be under c in direction of the object, this object doesn´t have to move towards the blackhole.
This is not a Kerr black hole BTW.

from what I understand from the questions is your saying is we have a (somewhat) stationary object outside of the event horizon, which has mass, and thus a gravitational pull in it\'s own right.  It\'s gravitational pull will lower the escape velosity below c, when on the side of said electron, and will allow possible escape from the blackhole.

Well if I have this part right, then I will venture a solution, or idea...

Originally posted by theomen
from what I understand from the questions is your saying is we have a (somewhat) stationary object outside of the event horizon, which has mass, and thus a gravitational pull in it\'s own right.  It\'s gravitational pull will lower the escape velosity below c, when on the side of said electron, and will allow possible escape from the blackhole.

Well if I have this part right, then I will venture a solution, or idea...

Bingo!! Interesting isn´t ?

The only thing I would have to say is that due to the great gravitational pull of the black hole, and frame dragging, that it would be quite difficult to find an instance where you had a some what static body of mass.

BUT, if we had two AGN\'s of the exact same mass, and created at the exact same instant, that were not kerr AGN\'s, and there was a body of mass in the exact middle of both these AGN\'s, this might be possible.  But then once again to take into consideration frame dragging, and surrounding stars, and planets, this balance could easily be thrown off.  But in theory it COULD happen.

Originally posted by theomen
 But in theory it COULD happen.

Well, isn´t that a interesting theory I have, I have send the theory to my University and I´m waiting for the responce.