Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: Activision does not support Xbox online.. and xbox in europe still not impressive  (Read 6994 times)

Offline nonamer
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Quote
Originally posted by mm
again, i used the wrong decimal point
lets recap

lets say xbox has hit 10% of PS2 sales, thats 3.5 million
20% of those that get online is 700,000
20% of those that actually have broadband is 140,000
how low of a % of the owners are willing to do the little things to comprimise?


Ok, now it makes sense. But still, how do you know that it\'s 20%? Some have said (in another forum) that it may be closer to 50% since most Xbox buyers are hardcore gamers with BB. All in all, we don\'t know, so this is pretty hard to argue. All I can say is that playing on the Xbox will be better.

Quote
extra long cable?
so the PC loses its connection to feed the xbox?


You can always plug it back in you know.:rolleyes:

Quote
yer full of moot points
HD\'s on consoles werent thought of back when PS2 launched
two controller ports keeps cost down
a small minority of consoles get more than two players at a time

here\'s a hint, yer wasting yer breath

in the immortal words,

"toot on" [/B]


Yeah, as if DVD playing ability and a digital out port are more useful.:rolleyes:

Quote
Originally posted by seven
I think you guys have wandered a bit off topic and missed out on the important thing:

While Xbox may come with more for its price (HD + Ethernetcard), it is loosing out on a lot of users simply due to its broadband only. Debate what you want - that is a serious drawback for the average Xbox buyer outthere that would love to use it but can\'t.

Secondly, the Xbox Live. Thanks to this brilliant idea (and the marketing gimmick of "having the best in mind for the consumer"), they are getting a lot of companies having second thoughts about making online games for their system. EA and Activision might be the only ones at the time, but I\'m sure lot more will follow if Microsoft doesn\'t ease up and do something about it. Missing out on those potential online games is a big minus. While Microsoft will be trying to get those online games on their own server, we on PS2 will be playing heaps of online games thanks to the support by developers. Yeah, the add-on is necessary, but Japan is already proving that it can be succesfull if the price is right. With a $80 dollar price here in the states for the HD (which is 5 times the size of Xbox\'s HD), I\'m sure it will find enough buyers to ensure good support.

And nonamer, even if mm\'s numbers are a bit off target, the princible is still the same: their will be more users online on PS2 than on Xbox, because it\'s not BB-only and more support by developers as it seems. Also bigger userbase on the PS2. You don\'t really have to do the math - it should be quite clear like this already.


The Xbox argument is this: It is traditionally believed that Addons = dead. Since ever Xbox has an BB connection and for PS2 and GC you need to buy a network adaptor, the percent of Xboxes that will be online (even assuming that only 20% have BB) will be greater than that of PS2 or GC. Also, a closed network, although it will scare off the big developers, will bring the small developers, because they can\'t afford a massive cluster of servers of their own, which should allow for more and better games.

Look at the PC online gaming market. It\'s tiny, unreliable depending on whose service you\'re using, cheating is often rampant, and there\'s no small and innovating guys because they can\'t afford it. The PS2 online plan will basically create the same thing. The Xbox argument is that if you want the same thing as the "PC online experience" on the PS2, DO SO ON THE PC. But with the Xbox, you have a close, fast, relatively cheatingless, and reliable online service that will be much better. There is actually a reason to get this service over the PC. It all rolls down to one thing: better service. Look at the big picture. There is almost no chance that PS2 plan could actually work over the long-haul if the PC online industry is any indication. But with the Xbox, there is actually a chance. So what if BB isn\'t popular now. It will be and even in its current shape it\'s still pretty potent. Naysayers who say that it has no chance, I say to you that its chances are better than you think.
Here lies a super cool sig

Offline clowd
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2187
  • Karma: +10/-0
Some have said 50% of x box owners are hard core and use bb?

From other forums?  Team x box maybe? x  box dot com?

You think 4 player is more important then dvd playback? ;)

bb will scare off the big developers but will bring in the small developers huh, and you think thats a good thing.  Your getting desperate.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2002, 04:27:12 PM by clowd »

Offline mm
  • clyde\'s boss
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15576
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
yeah addons = dead

thats why ffxi soldout 400,00 units

so, now yer going from definates to "chances"

glad you see our way of things
\"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.\" - Clemenza

Offline nonamer
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Quote
Originally posted by mm
yeah addons = dead

thats why ffxi soldout 400,00 units

so, now yer going from definates to "chances"

glad you see our way of things


400,000 or 40,000?

I never said Xbox Live will definitely win, I just said that it will be better and it actually has a chance of succeeding while PS2\'s plan won\'t work in the long run.

And Clowd, name a simple big developer that has a lot of experience making online games. They\'re all pretty much in the same boat.
Here lies a super cool sig

Offline mm
  • clyde\'s boss
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15576
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
EA, activision, and any other dev thats made PC titles

theyve been doing it for years

again, yer neglecting the 56k market and the majority it holds

i sense a pattern here
\"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.\" - Clemenza

Offline Chrono
  • Suikoden Maniac
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2575
  • Karma: +10/-0
Quote
And Clowd, name a simple big developer that has a lot of experience making online games. They\'re all pretty much in the same boat.


Simple, EA

Offline nonamer
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
I was refering to online only games. Of course they all made games with online feature.
Here lies a super cool sig

Offline cloud345
  • Super Bowl XXXVII
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2047
  • Karma: +10/-0
I think these are just bad decisions by the companies. I personally think MS can provide the best online gameing selection/service. This opinion isnt based on the system at all. Its just that since they are pretty much the biggest PC buisness and have dealt with online gaming before (right?). Im going to have to go with the exp. over hype.
1.FF7
  2. Grandia
  3. MGS
Is it me? Or does PSone own all the other systems?

Offline mm
  • clyde\'s boss
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15576
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
yeah, thier m$ zone is very reliable and secure

:P
\"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.\" - Clemenza

Offline Heretic
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
In the US broadband accounts for 16% of those already connected to the internet. A recent survey of 56k users projects slow growth of BB converts, with 9% responding they very interested in converting to BB within the next year, 16% somewhat interested, and  75% showing little to no interest in paying extra for high speed internet service. Sorry, didn\'t bookmark the source.

And I didn\'t see this next bit of info first hand but it fits in well with the previous set of figures; a forecast by Nielsen, independent from the one above, says BB connections may break the 50% level by around 2007, which suggests to me offering only BB service on this generation of consoles wasn\'t the wisest choice.

I see no good reason why we shouldn\'t expect to see a proportionally similar % of PS2 BB users to be playing games online as xboxers. In other words, the # of PS2 BB players = 10xs the # of xbox players. Nonamer thinks someone already paying $40 a month for BB service is going to balk at paying another $40 one time only to play PS2 games online for free? Get serious! Now add to that all the 56k players...

Anyway, I think all three consoles are just gearing up and positioning themselves for the future. If any of them make  money doing so this gen it\'ll just be icing for tomorrow\'s cake.

Offline Heretic
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 641
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
Quote
Originally posted by cloud345
I think these are just bad decisions by the companies. I personally think MS can provide the best online gameing selection/service. This opinion isnt based on the system at all. Its just that since they are pretty much the biggest PC buisness and have dealt with online gaming before (right?). Im going to have to go with the exp. over hype.


Ever hear of Everquest?

Offline Ryu
  • Greatest Detective
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3990
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://altimus-labs.com/hawk/
Both plans are fairly terrible, what is best for you varies from person to person.  Sony\'s online base will be bigger though with the inclusion of 56k.  That should settle all of this, why is it still being discussed?

Oh, and I can\'t believe someone said that the Xbox controller ports were modified USB ports... you swear I could plug my 56k USB modem into that port.  Mentioning that is so moot its baffling.
Don\'t you ever touch my cape.
-Ryu

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
Uggg...

and they say misery loves company...

must be a lot of misery around here.
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline Docwiz
  • Junior Member

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
  • Karma: +10/-0
Quote
Originally posted by mm
OUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

no EA?   no activision?

EA completely dominates the gaming sports realm

this is TERRIBLE news

:P


I emailed EA\'s CEO and said that his software are just rehashes and very low quality games and that he should step down and let me be CEO.  No cursing or threats at all.  Pretty much what I said.

I got an email back from EA\'s legal department saying that they are scared that I might do something to their CEO and they are thinking that I am dangerous and that they will report me to the proper authorities.

Now that is pretty weak and sad.  EA does suck and I hope John you are reading this.

You are scared because people don\'t like your software, well you are next to 3DO for your quality and you know a lot of other people are writing emails just like the one I wrote.  Its not a threat at all.  You just can\'t take critism.

EA lacks quality and lacks a good CEO.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2002, 04:05:08 AM by Docwiz »
Shweeet!

Offline mm
  • clyde\'s boss
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15576
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
OMG, ITS DOCWIZ!  hide the children!

dude, i hope you wrote that in jest, or yer pretty fukin pathetic

EA has DOMINATED the sports genre for a decade now

please crawl back in yer hole, before you smell rational thought and seek out to destroy it
\"Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.\" - Clemenza

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk