Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 20

Author Topic: ~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)  (Read 12118 times)

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #210 on: November 06, 2002, 04:08:04 PM »
actually a good D, could hurt the QB\'s numbers because he wouldn\'t be playing catchup, thus wouldn\'t be throwing as much.  However it could also help him, because it would limit his time off the field, if it held the opponent to few 1st downs.
Logged
Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #211 on: November 06, 2002, 04:33:07 PM »
But that, in turn, could lead to him being tired, if he has to play for a majority of the game time, and that could lead to interceptions and other mistakes.
Logged
.::§hockwave§::.
Offline clowd
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2187
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #212 on: November 07, 2002, 07:20:13 PM »
Without the Philly D McNabb and their offense would score 7 points a game
Logged
Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #213 on: November 07, 2002, 07:30:44 PM »
Ha, care to explain that reasoning?
Logged
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline Viper_Fujax

  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4927
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #214 on: November 07, 2002, 07:43:21 PM »
wouldnt it be that without their D, their offense would have a bunch of points since theyd get the ball so much?
Logged
You\'re never too old to burn to death in a fire
Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #215 on: November 07, 2002, 07:47:29 PM »
Well, assuming that they do still have some D in there (although a bad one), it wouldn\'t.  The other team would always go on long drives, meaning the offense would have the ball less than if a good defense forced three and outs.  The offense would also have worse field position, on average, with a worse defense.
Logged
.::§hockwave§::.
Offline ROL Jamas
  • Wannabe Lapdog
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.n64cc.com/forums
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #216 on: November 07, 2002, 08:25:37 PM »
Or be getting all of its\' field position from Kickoffs, like the Chiefs :(

That Clowd comment....I don\'t know what you mean by that =P

See Yuz.
Logged
What do Kerry Wood, Mark Prior, Matt Clement, and Carlos Zambrano have in common?

They\'re the pieces to the next great pitching rotation of our time, what else?

GO CUBS!
Offline clowd
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2187
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #217 on: November 07, 2002, 08:30:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by shockwaves
Ha, care to explain that reasoning?


Their defense gives them good field position.  If you watch how hard it is for the Eagles to move the ball its pathetic.  If McNabb was a pocket QB they would score 0 a game.  (Alot of exaggeration)
Logged
Offline ROL Jamas
  • Wannabe Lapdog
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.n64cc.com/forums
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #218 on: November 07, 2002, 08:33:37 PM »
There we are. You\'re right, they can\'t move the ball for their life. They haven\'t scored 40 points in quite some time (I believe it was against the Chiefs the last time they did it :()

Speaking of the Chiefs, 4-4, and going to go on a large run and make the playoffs by the end...to lose to the....well...The Chiefs can beat anybody in the AFC :)

See Yuz.
Logged
What do Kerry Wood, Mark Prior, Matt Clement, and Carlos Zambrano have in common?

They\'re the pieces to the next great pitching rotation of our time, what else?

GO CUBS!
Offline clowd
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2187
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #219 on: November 07, 2002, 08:38:06 PM »
They remind me of Virginia Tech.  When its time for them to throw the ball to catch up,  will they be able to do it?  McNabb is averaging 5 yards a pass...
Logged
Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #220 on: November 07, 2002, 09:12:31 PM »
The Patriots are gonna bury Chicago this weekend.
Logged
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!
Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #221 on: November 07, 2002, 09:38:40 PM »
well it looks like David BUSTon is out for the season, he has a torn patellar.  Sucks for James, because Boston is one of his starters, I guess it\'s time to hit the old waiver wire, or start making some deals.
Logged
Offline Luke
  • Russian Guyovich
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #222 on: November 07, 2002, 10:05:18 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by The Hurricane
The Patriots are gonna bury Chicago this weekend.


well see about that toughguy...


the bears are so due its not even funny, and they came real close to beating philly last week.


not that im biased or anything but the bears over the pats is my upset pick of the week.
Logged
Helloski.
Offline SwifDi
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9620
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #223 on: November 07, 2002, 10:08:31 PM »
I like the Pats big in that game as well. Chicago is just not the same team it once was.
Logged
Offline Luke
  • Russian Guyovich
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #224 on: November 07, 2002, 10:29:38 PM »
you mean last year? cause i know your too young to remember \'85... shit im too young to really remember \'85.

dont forget the pats were 3-13 the year before they won the super bowl.

the bears will soon be at thier rightfull place among the NFL\'s elite.


p.s. \'85 Bears BEST TEAM EVER!
Logged
Helloski.
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17 ... 20
« previous next »
 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk