Hello

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: ~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)  (Read 11945 times)

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #225 on: November 07, 2002, 10:35:00 PM »
I see the Pats tearing up the CHicago secondary, and a correction.

they were 5-11 in \'00 and 11-5 in \'01
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline Luke
  • Russian Guyovich
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #226 on: November 07, 2002, 10:39:53 PM »





ditka.... bearsssssss.... ditka............. bears.





little question my friends....

this years New England Patriots vs. 5 mini-Ditka\'s sitting in Lazy-Boys?

Ditka 38 - Pats 17
Helloski.

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #227 on: November 07, 2002, 10:46:36 PM »
"Bill Swerski\'s Super Fans", one of the greatest skits....EVER!

Daaaaa  Bears....
« Last Edit: November 07, 2002, 10:58:06 PM by theomen »

Offline ROL Jamas
  • Wannabe Lapdog
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://www.n64cc.com/forums
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #228 on: November 08, 2002, 05:32:40 AM »
Super Fan predictions, eh?

Well in that case, Ditka 210, Pats Negative 12.

Should be an interesting week of football. The Chiefs have a stiff test in San Francisco, and with their weak secondary, T.O. could go nuts.

See Yuz.
What do Kerry Wood, Mark Prior, Matt Clement, and Carlos Zambrano have in common?

They\'re the pieces to the next great pitching rotation of our time, what else?

GO CUBS!

Offline Mr. Kennedy
  • Resident Libertarian
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 9110
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #229 on: November 08, 2002, 06:34:02 AM »
yeah, about that...

that was about 20 years ago, get with the program buddy, Ditka aint coming back anytime soon.
\"In the last 12 months 100,000 private sector jobs have been lost and yet you\'ve created 30,000 public sector jobs. Prime Minister, you cannot carry on forever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecidented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt.\" - Daniel Hannan

Follow Me on Twitter!

Offline Luke
  • Russian Guyovich
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #230 on: November 08, 2002, 09:10:44 AM »
^
^
ummm, okay.






my prediction for this weekend.


bears 23 pats 17

oh by the way does anybody remember who the bears beat in super bowl 20?

« Last Edit: November 08, 2002, 09:19:56 AM by Luke »
Helloski.

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #231 on: November 08, 2002, 12:00:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Clowd


Their defense gives them good field position.  If you watch how hard it is for the Eagles to move the ball its pathetic.  If McNabb was a pocket QB they would score 0 a game.  (Alot of exaggeration)


You are clearly pulling that out of your ass.  The Eagles average the 2nd most yards per game of any NFC team.  They move the ball better than most teams out there, including the Packers, Niners, Saints, and Rams.  They scored over 40 against Dallas, which does have a decent D, 37 against the Skins, and 35 against the Texans.  They are third most in points in the NFC, behind only the Saints and the Packers, at over 27 points a game.  But the bottom line is, they move the ball better than almost any other team in the NFC, with the second most yards per game.  If you are going to claim something like that, make sure it\'s true first.
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #232 on: November 08, 2002, 12:20:43 PM »
For those in the FF League, here is the layout for the keeper league;

You can keep the following;
1QB
2RB
2WR
1TE
and 2 Extra Spots

The Draft postions will be decided by the worst record at the end of the season will get the first draft spot, and the place you finished in the playoffs.

Also, if I think anyone is purpously loosing games so that they can get the first draft spot, I\'ll put you at the last spot.  Another thing, the teams that have been very unactive will have their players taken and given to a new manager (49raiders, and Cloud could be the cassualties.  Cloud will be pulled because even though he checks on his team and sets his starters, he doesn\'t really take part in the league like the other teams.  The 49raiders will be pulled because he doesn\'t do shit other than set his roster, and we have no idea who the hell he is)

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #233 on: November 08, 2002, 12:29:45 PM »
Has luckee been doing stuff in the league?
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #234 on: November 08, 2002, 12:36:17 PM »
he hasn\'t been active since oct. 22nd

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #235 on: November 08, 2002, 12:37:46 PM »
And when he came on during the 22nd, didn\'t he post something saying he wouldn\'t be paying attention?
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline theomen
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7762
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • http://
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #236 on: November 08, 2002, 12:39:08 PM »
don\'t remember, did he?  Well if he continues to be inactive, then his team will be up for grabs.

Offline clowd
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2187
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #237 on: November 08, 2002, 08:32:14 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by shockwaves


You are clearly pulling that out of your ass.  The Eagles average the 2nd most yards per game of any NFC team.  They move the ball better than most teams out there, including the Packers, Niners, Saints, and Rams.  They scored over 40 against Dallas, which does have a decent D, 37 against the Skins, and 35 against the Texans.  They are third most in points in the NFC, behind only the Saints and the Packers, at over 27 points a game.  But the bottom line is, they move the ball better than almost any other team in the NFC, with the second most yards per game.  If you are going to claim something like that, make sure it\'s true first.


I dont adjust my thoughts of a team by stats.  I dont like stats.

Offline shockwaves
  • Read My Lips
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5288
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #238 on: November 09, 2002, 09:22:12 AM »
Heh, so you are telling me that even though the Eagles get the 2nd most yards per game, and the 3rd most points per game, you are sticking with your opinion that they can\'t move the ball?  Sad.
.::§hockwave§::.

Offline clowd
  • Legendary Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2187
  • Karma: +10/-0
~Official NFL 2002-2003 Thread~ (2)
« Reply #239 on: November 09, 2002, 10:23:36 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by shockwaves
Heh, so you are telling me that even though the Eagles get the 2nd most yards per game, and the 3rd most points per game, you are sticking with your opinion that they can\'t move the ball?  Sad.


You probably haven\'t seen them play this season so you look at stats and think they will tell you how a team is performing...

The Eagles had 300 yards rushing vs the Giants but Only scored what was it 20 points?  So if a stat person like you looked at this game you would think they had a very good game offensivley,  but the truth is they didnt.  McNabb saved them with his scrambling abilities

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk