Please understand I had that "pleasurable" expereince of "knowing" Christ in my blind, pre-teen to early teen days. I understand that Christians belive in the inherent evil within mankind, ever since Adam disobayed His Mightlyness in The Garden of Eden. I understand that Christians belive His Mightyness, in His eternal love, sent His only son to take "serve the sentence" for humanity. (now there\'s a niec little story to tell hte kids) I bought it with my heart, I then gave it back for what many consider to be the truth.
From what I can remember, what counts in the end is your love and commitment to Christ, not each other. :P Your position on that is indicative of your deviatoin from "The Good Book". And it shows: What you are describing to me is a well balanced, modern relationship where both parties have EAQUAL importance. Submission is indeed the basis of your unity, but you\'re both submitting to each other (not just the wife to the husband). That\'s nice, cute and takes a bit of time to derive from the statement we\'re arguing about.
That statement is of course, this:
“wives, submit to your husbands” is also succeeded by the statement “men, love your wives as Christ loved the church”.
Let us say that you are applying this statement to your situation. And you have decided that to love your wife in the same way that Christ loved The Church, you need to submit to her as much as she does to you. And because of this, you therefore deem the statement to be fair to both men and women. But to successfully argue your case, you must apply it to every single situation! By simple common sense, you have to accept that the latter portion of the statement can be interpreted in different ways! Unlike the former part, which is a clear instruction for wives to submit to their husbands!
It would probably be easier for you to see this if you simply concentrate on symantics. I ask you to indulge me again.