In SH you can easily avoid monsters but you also want to get rid of them because they are disturbing you.
I want to kill them because they are disturbing me?
:rolleyes:
Why kill a monster that poses no threa
t?
In RE, sure you had to actually use your weapons, but that\'s because the monsters always posed a threat on your life.
Dont compare the way SH is trying to scare you as if its trying to scare you the same way the Resi is.
I\'m not. SH provides you with a much greater safety net in that it really limits where it\'s monsters are. Meaning, if you avoid those areas, you\'ll be fine. I know I\'m rarely scared knowing that I only need to get past one monster, and get into the second door from the left, and there will be no more worries. In RE (again, mainly in the first two, much less so in the others) it was always a relief to actually make it to a save room. After being chased by zombies/hunters/whatever, through three or so rooms when I don\'t have any health (or perhaps forgot to bring backup health - for the later games), I always beathed a sigh of relief upon hearing that save room music.
he likes shock films. cheap tricks that would make you jump.
I really don\'t consider those movies to be shock horror. Perhaps a combination of shock, and creepiness.
But it\'s hardly about being scary anymore, at least for myself. Resident Evil hasn\'t been all that scary (read: able to make me feel uneasy) since the original (and perhaps REmake), and the same goes for Silent Hill.