Saddam in court today!

[Titan]

"Only YOU can prevent forest fires."



"It was them, I swear"



"EUREKA! I remembered where my weapons of mass destruction are!"

[Living-In-Clip]

Originally posted by ViVi
He knows whats going to happen. On headline news they said he mumbled "this is all theater."

It\'s true. This whole thing is theater and has no real purpose (much like our "war"). He has no chance of a fair trial and this whole case is a mockery of the justice system and international law.

[Jumpman]

"Too many mofos overusing my picture in this thread!"

[GmanJoe]

Originally posted by Living-In-Clip
It\'s true. This whole thing is theater and has no real purpose (much like our "war"). He has no chance of a fair trial and this whole case is a mockery of the justice system and international law.

Ya mean to say he\'s innocent?

[Cerberus]

I think these pics are prime candidates for a photochop contest.

Arrrrrrr, it\'s been a while.

Hi .. i am your new proctologist...Dr Hussain

.
.
.
I guarantee that I can cure you of your chronic hemorrhoids  …or your money back

.
.
.
With THIS magic finger !

Ya mean to say he\'s innocent?

 

No, he means that you and everybody else has already decided that he is 100% guilty. And that sorta negates the purpose of having a court system at all...

[GmanJoe]

Originally posted by Deadly Hamster
No, he means that you and everybody else has already decided that he is 100% guilty. And that sorta negates the purpose of having a court system at all...

I\'m not trying him. The Iraqis are. And who better to try him than his own people? My opinion has nothing to do with their due process.

He IS guilty, BTW.

Is Bush guilty of warcrimes if civilians are dying in IRAQ, or elsewhere in the world?

We have invaded IRAQ, and pushed out political system on them. Perhaps every country that is not a democracy should be invaded. (uh mean liberated) I am tempted to go into a long rant about how little true freedom this country has, but then the FBI would prob show up on my door.:eek:

What don\'t you have the freedom to do Capcom?  Enlighten us.

The civilians who are dying in Iraq are being killed by their fellow Arabs.  Trying to equate Bush to Saddam is nonsense.

[GmanJoe]

Originally posted by Capcom
Is Bush guilty of warcrimes if civilians are dying in IRAQ, or elsewhere in the world?

We have invaded IRAQ, and pushed out political system on them. Perhaps every country that is not a democracy should be invaded. (uh mean liberated) I am tempted to go into a long rant about how little true freedom this country has, but then the FBI would prob show up on my door.:eek:

War crimes? Like executing or purposely ordering the killing of unarmed civilians? No.

Is Saddam guilty of war crimes (which is what this thread is about), the evidence seems to point that way.

[Titan]

Bush isn\'t going around ordering the gassing of innocent men, women and children. Bush isn\'t shocking the balls of people he feel are against him (there will be a lot of people with fish that don\'t swim upstream if this were true). Bush only invaded a country whose leaders continueously broke international treaties which were punishable by invasion and was the only leader (besides Britain) with the balls to follow through with the consequences against Iraq for breaking the treaties and crimes against humanity.

So they have proof he was shocking peoples balls? Remember the prison? Alot was sealed from the American public if memory serves me right. If you want to hold Sadam for every wrongdoing in that country. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

Could very well be wrong, but in the part of the world IRAQ is in. It would seem like a suicidal idea to say we have no weapons. When we pull out then they would be open for invasion from another country nearby.

I am not saying he is good guy. He is more than likely a very bad person. It does not make sense to invade a country that was crippled. GW wanted a way in, and 911 gave it to him. Wether there was a connection or not. He was going in because he is paranoid. Sure Sadam did not care for the US, but then again the US hates him. I would almost bet that most of you would pay to see him executed. It does not make sense to me.

So far as ordering the deaths of civilians. I am quite sure I remember news of smart bombs hitting civilian dwellings. Or if you want to go back further in history the bombings of hiroshima or nagasaki.

Originally posted by Titan
Bush isn\'t going around ordering the gassing of innocent men, women and children. Bush isn\'t shocking the balls of people he feel are against him (there will be a lot of people with fish that don\'t swim upstream if this were true). Bush only invaded a country whose leaders continueously broke international treaties which were punishable by invasion and was the only leader (besides Britain) with the balls to follow through with the consequences against Iraq for breaking the treaties and crimes against humanity.

[GmanJoe]

Originally posted by Capcom
So they have proof he was shocking peoples balls? Remember the prison? Alot was sealed from the American public if memory serves me right. If you want to hold Sadam for every wrongdoing in that country. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

The difference here is that these US prison guards got a bit gung ho. Tell me how these guard\'s actions make Bush Jr guilty? Do you have proof that he ordered these guards to molest these prisoners?

In Saddam\'s case, it was documented that when one person in his administration questioned his tactics, he was chopped up the next day.

Is that any different than the majority of the countries in that region?

Originally posted by GmanJoe
The difference here is that these US prison guards got a bit gung ho. Tell me how these guard\'s actions make Bush Jr guilty? Do you have proof that he ordered these guards to molest these prisoners?

In Saddam\'s case, it was documented that when one person in his administration questioned his tactics, he was chopped up the next day.