Good points Ryu but you\'ll never get this conservative to think abortion is the right thing to do for a woman who forgot to take the pill.
I\'m not trying to say it\'s a substitute as the pill is still the cheap and easy alternative to an abortion, but I do think having an abortion is a much better alternative to a woman giving birth to an unwanted child and giving it away to a public who is unwilling to shoulder the financial burden we all will have to share.
I am curious of one thing though, do you guys, conservatives, think taking away a woman\'s right to choose and forcing them to undergo an unwanted pregnancy is the best thing for the child or the only suitable punishment for the mother? I\'m starting to think these two things, when it comes to removing the right to choose, are easily confused with one another when it comes to conservatives.
In my feeble, 1940\'s mind I still think sex should be saved for marriage. Many people still believe this as well and shudder at the thought of millions of moms killing off their children before they have the chance to live.
I agree with most of that. I too am someone who believes in sex only after marriage and I don\'t believe in having many sexual partners before settling on one. However, I do think that bringing a child into a world where they are not wanted and\\or needed and throwing them into the system is a lot worse then destroying the fetus. Perhaps if orphans or adopted children were handled a LOT better, I might agree with you, but if given the option in this day and age, giving the woman the right to choose is, in my whole hearted opinion, the humane thing to do.